▲ 332 ▼ Online Gaming Platforms And YouTube Will Also Seemingly Be Banned For Aussies Under 16 (press-start.com.au) submitted 2 years ago by goat@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world 89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) I had a bank account when I was 11. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -17 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doing a real good job of building bridges to convey your ideas, I see... Unless of course you don't want to share thoughts and just want to be right. With banks there's a financial incentive for private institutions to provide barriers. Barriers that can still be bypassed with the right tools and initiative. That incentive doesn't exist for media providers. They just want their content as accessible as possible. Meaning any roadblocks they're forced to utilize will be half-assed at best. Not to mention it's a stupid idea in the first place. Banning something doesn't make it better, it just makes it more tantalizing. Just look at prohibition, or abstinence only education. All it does is create a more unsafe environment for those outlets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -17 points 2 years ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doing a real good job of building bridges to convey your ideas, I see... Unless of course you don't want to share thoughts and just want to be right. With banks there's a financial incentive for private institutions to provide barriers. Barriers that can still be bypassed with the right tools and initiative. That incentive doesn't exist for media providers. They just want their content as accessible as possible. Meaning any roadblocks they're forced to utilize will be half-assed at best. Not to mention it's a stupid idea in the first place. Banning something doesn't make it better, it just makes it more tantalizing. Just look at prohibition, or abstinence only education. All it does is create a more unsafe environment for those outlets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Doing a real good job of building bridges to convey your ideas, I see... Unless of course you don't want to share thoughts and just want to be right. With banks there's a financial incentive for private institutions to provide barriers. Barriers that can still be bypassed with the right tools and initiative. That incentive doesn't exist for media providers. They just want their content as accessible as possible. Meaning any roadblocks they're forced to utilize will be half-assed at best. Not to mention it's a stupid idea in the first place. Banning something doesn't make it better, it just makes it more tantalizing. Just look at prohibition, or abstinence only education. All it does is create a more unsafe environment for those outlets. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent