222
‼️‼️Hexbear Agitprop U.S. election response/commentary resource post‼️‼️ (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [M] to c/agitprop@hexbear.net
248 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YOU are speaking!

Have you made any poignant commentary on the recent election in the U.S.? Do you have a good response to liberals who are upset with the results or process of the election? Have you written or seen something as a comment reply/post that you think has standalone value? Did you see a new take or analysis you hadn’t previously considered?

Whether it’s a long idea with lots of context, or a short and sweet one liner, we want those thoughts aggregated here. This post is intended to be a resource for comrades to draw from when having actual discussions outside of Hexbear both online or IRL regarding the election.

Consider this a mini-effortpost aggregator. This is not for shitposts, but humor is completely acceptable if it helps make the point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Low turnout is a reflection of the campaign and the current administrations favorability. Harris didn't break away far enough from Biden's policies on all fronts which left the base drained of enthusiasm. Turning to the right alienated the progressive wing of voters. Simple as.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think it was alienating progressive voters, otherwise we'd see more votes for Stein and West, etc. I think she simply didn't get people excited enough to vote.

    I'd like to think that a plurality of voters are explicitly progressive, but it's a better explanation that popular policy and messaging gets people out, and unpopular policy and messaging doesn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    alienating progressive voters
    get people excited enough to vote

    These seem like the same thing to me. Couldn't a progressive who feels alienated by the campaign also fully believe that Stein and maybe even West are agents of Russia and not want to vote for them? Could they have shown up and instead only voted on down ballot races instead?

    I'd like to think that a plurality of voters are explicitly progressive, but it's a better explanation that popular policy and messaging gets people out, and unpopular policy and messaging doesn't.

    I agree with this. People either feel like someone has answers to their anxieties about the future, or they don't. When they feel like they don't, they become non-voters.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent