217
Kamala Harris suddenly becomes favorite to win in top election forecast (www.newsweek.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

Polling aggregator FiveThirtyEight has named Vice President Kamala Harris as the narrow favorite to win the presidential race on Election Day, shifting from former President Donald Trump for the first time since October 17.

Harris's lead is razor-thin, with FiveThirtyEight’s model showing her winning 50 out of 100 simulations compared to Trump’s 49. Similarly, Nate Silver’s model in The Silver Bulletin also slightly favors Harris, giving her a win in 50.015% of cases.

Both forecasts emphasize the unprecedented closeness of this race, with Pennsylvania as a key battleground.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

50.015% literally means that neither candidate is favored to win. Take out a coin, assign Harris as heads and trump as tails, now flip the coin a bunch of times - and that's exactly how often Harris or trump is likely to win the election

EDIT

Nate Silver just posted his final pre-election blog post and he explains very clearly that this is a dead even race. Either candidate is just as likely to win as the other candidate.

https://www.natesilver.net/p/a-random-number-generator-determined

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I heard that Nate was also being critical of pollsters who were "herding" their results to not get caught too far on the wrong side, and yet he's doing it. I'm just going to watch the results come in and not worry about trying to predict the future that will be known soon enough.

    The only good thing with all these "tied" poll reports is that it may encourage voting to break a perceived tie. So vote like it's tied, and hope for a blowout.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    He's not doing anything. His model is setup many months before the election, and then it stays completely unchanged until the election is over. He doesn't do any polling, he just runs his pre-set simulation model on the data that the pollsters release

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    His model and 538s have both produced outcomes where one candidate gets 520+ EVs.

    He assigns the quality ratings to polls himself and publicly announces them. They’re based on whether or not they predicted the outcome of the election.

    It’s his very poll scoring system that causes polls to herd. Because even if they’re wrong, they’re wrong together.

    He determines the weights of those polls and chooses how to apply them.

    Nate has done plenty.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent