this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024

34 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

sneerclub@awful.systems

1,299 readers

147 active

5 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 3 years ago

moderators

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems

your Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be counted (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 years ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

archive: https://archive.ph/wRpVA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ok so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

bayesian epistemology for sure

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Collectivist@awful.systems -4 points 2 years ago

Well naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I've yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.

parent