you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

unfortunately neither Sanders, AOC, nor Warren are real solutions and never will be the solution. They mostly pay lip service to progressive causes but then actually support atrocities like the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia (in Sanders' case).

their job seems to be to "capture" progressive support and then endorce the reactionary candidates they actually plan on pushing. And even if they were to come to power, the best case is a renewal of capitalism so that it may exist another year/decade/century

as the DNC has become beyond repair

that is the case with the whole of the USA, it's beyond repair and in dire need of abolition if humanity is to have a future. Bourgeois "democracy" is inherently designed to halt real progress and to preserve the private (not personal!) property of the rich and the economic system that makes it possible in the first place (capitalism).

One viable future would be a socialist council democracy as one of the few true solutions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Oh hi, I'm not that well informed about Mamdani, but to me it seems like there are two possible trajectories to his career:

    1. He becomes the next Sanders/AOC, spineless and reactionary Democrat wearing the corpse of progressiveness
    2. He will stay true to his principles akin to someone like Jerry Corbyn and hold the least harmful position one can hold in such a reactionary party as the Dems (or Labour). Maybe he will even make it to leadership positions, but then he is destined to get the Corbyn treatment of a shitstorm of smear campaigns...

    Still even Corbyn would never threaten capitalism, but he was pushing for what Labour once was, before full on neoliberalism/the third way

  • source
  • parent