you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

They let tank man go at the time and no one knows what happened to him.

So on what basis do you assume something bad happened to him rather than he just went home and carried on with his life?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago*

    Point is, they weren't. Which is also supported by eyewitnesses like foreign reporters. You seem to mistake the british story for what actually happened. Unfortunately all evidence is not in support of that story. Fortunately anglos do not care about evidence.

    Do you want some reading material? Just ask, it is no big deal.

  • source
  • parent