Pull request #10974 introduces the @bitwarden/sdk-internal dependency which is needed to build the desktop client. The dependency contains a licence statement which contains the following clause:

You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.

This violates freedom 0.

It is not possible to build desktop-v2024.10.0 (or, likely, current master) without removing this dependency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bilb@lem.monster 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I haven't looked into it at all, but that just seems so strange. Who would pay that when the original Bitwarden app is still there for free? Most people who would even know about KeyGuard would know how to install it from somewhere else. Is it essentially a donation?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 2 years ago

It would be if it's a one-time payment, but it's a yearly subscription, and not a cheap one!

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4