828
The Internet Archive is under attack, with a popup claiming a ‘catastrophic’ breach (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Shouldn't that be the content creator's prerogative? What if the content had a significant error? What if they removed the page because of a request from someone living in the EU requested it under their laws? What if the page was edited because someone accidentally made their address and phone number public in a forum post?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nah. It just lets slimy gits claim they never said XYZ, or that such and such a thing never happened. With as volatile a storage media as internet media, hard backups are absolutely necessary. Put it this way; would you have the same complaimt about a newspaper? A TV show? Post your opinion piece to a newspaper and it's fixed in ink forever. Yet somehow you complain when that same opinion piece is on a website? Get outta here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    Like I said, I have no problems with individuals archiving it and not republishing it.

    If I take a newspaper article and republish it on my site I guarantee you I will get a takedown notice. That will be especially true if I start linking to my copy as the canonical source from places like Wikipedia.

    It's a fine line. Is archive.org a library (wasn't there a court case about this recently...) or are they republishing?

    Either way, it doesn't matter for me any more. The pages are gone from the archive, and they won't archive any more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent