223
Greg Rutkowski Was Removed From Stable Diffusion, But AI Artists Brought Him Back - Decrypt (decrypt.co)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
246 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Greg Rutkowski, a digital artist known for his surreal style, opposes AI art but his name and style have been frequently used by AI art generators without his consent. In response, Stable Diffusion removed his work from their dataset in version 2.0. However, the community has now created a tool to emulate Rutkowski's style against his wishes using a LoRA model. While some argue this is unethical, others justify it since Rutkowski's art has already been widely used in Stable Diffusion 1.5. The debate highlights the blurry line between innovation and infringement in the emerging field of AI art.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

I don't like when people say "AI just traces/photobashes art." Because that simply isn't what happens.

But I do very much wish there was some sort of opt-out process, but ultimately any attempt at that just wouldn't work

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    There's nothing stopping someone from licensing their art in a fashion that prohibits their use in that fashion.
    No one has created that license that I know of, but there are software licenses that do similar things, so it's hardly an unprecedented notion.

    The fact of the matter is that before people didn't think it was necessary to have specific usage licenses attached to art because no one got funny feelings from people creating derivative works from them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent