Like, the nutrition facts table says it contains nothing other than some sodium. No sugars or fats or calories at all

Yet it clearly is edible, so what is it? Some concoction made mostly from indigestible minerals?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

As I understand diet coke uses sucralose, not aspartame as sweetener.

Sucralose has a different sweetness profile, much closer to real sugar and is not bitter. Compared to aspartame in zero/light that needs 0.2g salt/liter to cover up the bitterness.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This is not correct.

    Diet Coke definitely still uses aspartame and not sucralose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I see that the study uses 48mg sucralose in 60ml water amounting to 0.8g/liter.

    My Cola recipe with pure sucralose uses 0.167g/liter this should be equivalent to normal soda sweetness of 100g sugar/liter.

    The issue I had with sucralose was that it seemed to go out of solution in the syrup that's why my current Cola recipe uses a mix of sucralose/saccharin/stevia in the ratio of 30/30/40 which amounts to 0.05g sucralose/liter so if I drink 1 liter of soda I'll get the same amount as their study.

    The reason I continue to use sucralose is that it rounds out the flavor of saccharin and stevia.

  • source
  • parent