66
Breakthrough barium titanate solar panels are 1000x more powerful than existing panels (www.thebrighterside.news)
submitted 2 years ago by [M] to c/energy@slrpnk.net
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Researchers at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU) have discovered a new method to increase the efficiency of solar cells by a factor of 1,000. The team of scientists achieved this breakthrough by creating crystalline layers of barium titanate, strontium titanate, and calcium titanate, which were alternately placed on top of one another in a lattice structure.

Their findings, which could revolutionize the solar energy industry, were recently published in the journal Science Advances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It says in the article

compared to pure barium titanate of a similar thickness, the current flow was up to 1,000 times stronger

And in the referenced paper

In addition, the photoresponse from SBC222 is 1000 times higher than that from BTO

Neither sound like a measure of efficiency to me. But I'm also no expert and the paper went well beyond my head.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    "Strong current flow" is informal language, but both it and photoresponse refer to the electrical power that comes out. In theory you would just divide that by the incoming solar flux and get the efficiency. For now it's only in a lab setting, though, so we'll have to see what the practical efficiency will be if this is actually incorporated into a reasonable solar cell.

    So yeah, apparently barium titanate solar panels used to be extremely terrible, and now they might become competitive with further research.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It's not a measure of efficiency per se, but efficiency is a limiting factor:

    In order for a solar panel to put out 1000x more power, the baseline you're comparing it to must be at most 0.1% efficient, because otherwise the new thing would have greater than 100% efficiency and that isn't possible.

    And that's a purely thermodynamic argument. The actual limit for solar efficiency is likely less.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent