you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 107 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

This isn’t so much an argument for piracy as it is an argument to not patronize Disney. Especially considering that Disney’s motion for arbitration is so far beyond baseless that it’s baffling they’d even attempt it.

AKA: No, Disney will not be able to force you to arbitrate a dispute just because you once (or still do) subscribed to Disney+. Their motion will be denied, and pirating their content will not - in any way - afford you legal protections in the future.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago

    Their motion will be denied, and pirating their content will not - in any way - afford you legal protections in the future.

    We don't know that yet. I want that to be true. I hope it's true. But it isn't true yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It is an argument for piracy. Want to watch a Disney show but don't want to give Disney money in any way? Piracy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Pirating their content doesn't afford you legal protections but agreeing to their license agreements could definitely turn out to have been a big mistake.

    If you're just itching for that content, pick your poison.

  • source
  • parent