887
Crowd Cheers as Convicted Rapist is Eliminated in Olympic Beach Volleyball (www.thedailybeast.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/world@lemmy.world
227 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Non-paywall: https://12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/crowd-cheers-as-convicted-rapist-is-eliminated-in-olympic-beach-volleyball?ref=home?ref=home

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 years ago (10 children)

On what grounds would he be removed though? Is there a reason countries shouldn't select athletes that have been to prison?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    All Olympic athletes sign a declaration saying they’ll strive to be a role model or something similar. I’d say a convicted rapist shouldn’t be considered a role model and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to compete.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I get your point, but a convicted criminal who is rehabilitated could also be considered a good role model. Not saying he is, but not really a means to disqualify him.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, I thought the same when I wrote the comment. I’ve read a bit more about him and what he was charged with. In the UK he wasn’t convicted of grooming - they prosecuted him for it but he was found not guilty. I think it was a consensual relationship, but of course a 19 year old having sex with a 12 year old is rape regardless of consent in the UK and he was (rightly) convicted of that. In the Netherlands however the law is different, it wasn’t considered rape but something like “morally offensive actions”. So from the Dutch pov he’s not actually a rapist, which might explain why the Dutch Olympic committee don’t seem to think it’s that big a deal. Despite that, I still think a convicted pedophile rapist should not be allowed to compete in the games, but that needs to be made clear in the eligibility requirements by the IOC, rather than the wishy-washy “role model” contract.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The fact that he's a fucking child rapist. No need to be an apologist for the pedophile, he's a shit person and it's ok to call him that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah but that's not really what my question was about.

    Why shouldn't the Dutch delegation select him? And what rules would prevent a selection of any convicted criminal?

    Or are we talking about the IOC specifically banning people convicted of child rape offences?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why shouldn’t the Dutch delegation select him? And what rules would prevent a selection of any convicted criminal?

    Olympic athletes are representatives of their home country. Why the fuck would you pick a child rapist to be your representative? Were the cannibals unavailable or something?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •