▲ 781 ▼ Amazon faces potential break-up as FTC finalizes antitrust lawsuit | The FTC is getting ready for the big one (www.techspot.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 127 comments fedilink hide all child comments Amazon faces potential break-up as FTC finalizes antitrust lawsuit | The FTC is getting ready for the big one::undefined
[–] Corran1138@lemmy.world 234 points 3 years ago (12 children) I will believe it when I see it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 99 points 3 years ago (4 children) Yeah remember when they were going to break up Microsoft? That went great. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 30 points 3 years ago (3 children) Yeah, there the FTC was with a clear market that Microsoft would have a monopoly over should the merger go through. They had Microsoft on the ropes, but, before they could finish them, Microsoft pinky promised prices wouldn't go up. And that was that, no threat of a monopoly and the merger could go through. ... the current antitrust ruling guidelines make enforcement basically impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago (2 children) It was more that George w Bush was elected. And cracking down on monopolies is against the code of fascists. Ideally they want to be in charge of all the monopolies. So he more or less called off the suit just as they were about to close in on Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I meant the Microsoft Activision Blizzard fiasco, I guess I didn't realize. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 48 points 3 years ago (5 children) Hell, I won't believe it even when I'll see it. Likely some loophole will be found to dodge this in one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not to be pedantic, but isn’t that the same as “I’ll believe it when I see it”? You’re just saying it won’t happen permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago I think they’re saying even if this goes through amazon will find a way to ignore it permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ELI70@lemmy.run -6 points 3 years ago (1 child) There is mods on lemmy? I just found out there is also karma, why are we recreating a toxic authoritarian shit hole but decentralized? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop. Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community. But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Came here to say exactly this. Not going to happen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 99 points 3 years ago (4 children) Yeah remember when they were going to break up Microsoft? That went great. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 30 points 3 years ago (3 children) Yeah, there the FTC was with a clear market that Microsoft would have a monopoly over should the merger go through. They had Microsoft on the ropes, but, before they could finish them, Microsoft pinky promised prices wouldn't go up. And that was that, no threat of a monopoly and the merger could go through. ... the current antitrust ruling guidelines make enforcement basically impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago (2 children) It was more that George w Bush was elected. And cracking down on monopolies is against the code of fascists. Ideally they want to be in charge of all the monopolies. So he more or less called off the suit just as they were about to close in on Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I meant the Microsoft Activision Blizzard fiasco, I guess I didn't realize. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 30 points 3 years ago (3 children) Yeah, there the FTC was with a clear market that Microsoft would have a monopoly over should the merger go through. They had Microsoft on the ropes, but, before they could finish them, Microsoft pinky promised prices wouldn't go up. And that was that, no threat of a monopoly and the merger could go through. ... the current antitrust ruling guidelines make enforcement basically impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago (2 children) It was more that George w Bush was elected. And cracking down on monopolies is against the code of fascists. Ideally they want to be in charge of all the monopolies. So he more or less called off the suit just as they were about to close in on Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I meant the Microsoft Activision Blizzard fiasco, I guess I didn't realize. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 28 points 3 years ago (2 children) It was more that George w Bush was elected. And cracking down on monopolies is against the code of fascists. Ideally they want to be in charge of all the monopolies. So he more or less called off the suit just as they were about to close in on Microsoft. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I meant the Microsoft Activision Blizzard fiasco, I guess I didn't realize. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago (1 child) I meant the Microsoft Activision Blizzard fiasco, I guess I didn't realize. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago Oh yes that too. Microsoft is always been bad though. Always will be always has been. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 48 points 3 years ago (5 children) Hell, I won't believe it even when I'll see it. Likely some loophole will be found to dodge this in one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not to be pedantic, but isn’t that the same as “I’ll believe it when I see it”? You’re just saying it won’t happen permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago I think they’re saying even if this goes through amazon will find a way to ignore it permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ELI70@lemmy.run -6 points 3 years ago (1 child) There is mods on lemmy? I just found out there is also karma, why are we recreating a toxic authoritarian shit hole but decentralized? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop. Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community. But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Not to be pedantic, but isn’t that the same as “I’ll believe it when I see it”? You’re just saying it won’t happen permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago I think they’re saying even if this goes through amazon will find a way to ignore it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 17 points 3 years ago I think they’re saying even if this goes through amazon will find a way to ignore it permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ELI70@lemmy.run -6 points 3 years ago (1 child) There is mods on lemmy? I just found out there is also karma, why are we recreating a toxic authoritarian shit hole but decentralized? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop. Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community. But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ELI70@lemmy.run -6 points 3 years ago (1 child) There is mods on lemmy? I just found out there is also karma, why are we recreating a toxic authoritarian shit hole but decentralized? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop. Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community. But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Instances have to be created and run by somebody, so we automatically have a bunch of admins in the loop. Then somebody has to make communities on the instances. That involves choosing the purpose of the community, and writing any relevant description or guidelines. So again you inherently start with somebody in charge of the community. But none of them answer to a corporate overlord. Things are run the way the people decide. And if the people disagree, they can run different communities or instances. There can easily be unmoderated communities, and I’m sure there are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Came here to say exactly this. Not going to happen. permalink fedilink source parent