▲ 750 ▼ Before times. (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (4 children) Who designed these fruits? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago monsanto iirc permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago I posted this as a reply to another comment from a user on another instance, but your instance doesn't allow you to see hexbear, so I'll reply here too. Yeah, it's a bit unfortunate using the word design that way. However, it's not completely wrong, it's almost more a problem of the baggage that the word design carries, obviously "intelligent design" as a concept for evolution is bullshit and if you can't separate the concept of "design" from intent then you're still just as wrong. All that said, I think it's fair to talk about species being designed, there is just absolutely zero intent involved anywhere,* with no forethought, or any "thought" at all from the designer. A species is "designed" entirely by the forces of circumstance. The material conditions, if you will, of their environment. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ZarkleFarkle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago I posted this as a reply to another comment from a user on another instance, but your instance doesn't allow you to see hexbear, so I'll reply here too. Yeah, it's a bit unfortunate using the word design that way. However, it's not completely wrong, it's almost more a problem of the baggage that the word design carries, obviously "intelligent design" as a concept for evolution is bullshit and if you can't separate the concept of "design" from intent then you're still just as wrong. All that said, I think it's fair to talk about species being designed, there is just absolutely zero intent involved anywhere,* with no forethought, or any "thought" at all from the designer. A species is "designed" entirely by the forces of circumstance. The material conditions, if you will, of their environment. permalink fedilink source parent