▲ 2135 ▼ "Progress" (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by tictac2@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 276 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Onionizer@geddit.social -13 points 3 years ago (2 children) Most cities just can't really afford it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 years ago (2 children) yeah, car infrastructure is expensive and they should just get rid of it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gusVLZ@lemmy.world 23 points 3 years ago (1 child) Fuck cars permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Well, if you insist... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Onionizer@geddit.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) By replacing it with more expensive car infrastructure? That's what happened in this picture permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, by replacing it with public transportation and human-scaled spaces. Well, leaving one small part of it for service vehicles and people who absolutely need to go buy car if there is no better option. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Sure, I agree, but you do realize where the highway went in this picture, right? It's still there... Edit: Cease fire! Friendly fire!!! FrieNDLY FIIIIREEEE!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 21 points 3 years ago They actually can't afford not to. Walkable cities improve the economies of cities because people are actually able to get to stores on roads that would otherwise be swamped with cars. It improves health and safety as well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 3 years ago (2 children) yeah, car infrastructure is expensive and they should just get rid of it entirely. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gusVLZ@lemmy.world 23 points 3 years ago (1 child) Fuck cars permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Well, if you insist... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Onionizer@geddit.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) By replacing it with more expensive car infrastructure? That's what happened in this picture permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, by replacing it with public transportation and human-scaled spaces. Well, leaving one small part of it for service vehicles and people who absolutely need to go buy car if there is no better option. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Sure, I agree, but you do realize where the highway went in this picture, right? It's still there... Edit: Cease fire! Friendly fire!!! FrieNDLY FIIIIREEEE!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gusVLZ@lemmy.world 23 points 3 years ago (1 child) Fuck cars permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Well, if you insist... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago Well, if you insist... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Onionizer@geddit.social -3 points 3 years ago (1 child) By replacing it with more expensive car infrastructure? That's what happened in this picture permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, by replacing it with public transportation and human-scaled spaces. Well, leaving one small part of it for service vehicles and people who absolutely need to go buy car if there is no better option. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Sure, I agree, but you do realize where the highway went in this picture, right? It's still there... Edit: Cease fire! Friendly fire!!! FrieNDLY FIIIIREEEE!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, by replacing it with public transportation and human-scaled spaces. Well, leaving one small part of it for service vehicles and people who absolutely need to go buy car if there is no better option. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Sure, I agree, but you do realize where the highway went in this picture, right? It's still there... Edit: Cease fire! Friendly fire!!! FrieNDLY FIIIIREEEE!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ikka@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Sure, I agree, but you do realize where the highway went in this picture, right? It's still there... Edit: Cease fire! Friendly fire!!! FrieNDLY FIIIIREEEE!!! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago Sure, that wehicle part might as well live underground, if the country has enough money for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 21 points 3 years ago They actually can't afford not to. Walkable cities improve the economies of cities because people are actually able to get to stores on roads that would otherwise be swamped with cars. It improves health and safety as well. permalink fedilink source parent