CrowdStrike effectively bricked windows, Mac and Linux today.

Windows machines won’t boot, and Mac and Linux work is abandoned because all their users are on twitter making memes.

Incredible work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 2 years ago (24 children)

They make software for both of them also though, IMO they're at fault for sure but so should be Microsoft for making a trash operating system.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Not saying Windows isn't trash, but considering what CrowdStrike's software is, they could have bricked Mac or Linux just as hard. The CrowdStrike agent has pretty broad access to modify and block execution of system files. Nuke a few of the wrong files, and any OS is going to grind to a halt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Probably would have been worse if this was on Linux. That's like 90% of the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Good thing is the kind of people making decisions based on buzzword-bongo filled PR campaigns like Crowdstrike's are already forcing their IT to use Windows anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    It was a serious ask to install it from auditors that don't know what the fuck they are doing. On all ec2 machines for "reasons" I'm sure there are companies out there pushed into doing this because they don't have people willing to die on those hills.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Yes and no. Linux is inherently more diverse. All the different distros doing things in different ways, sometimes with different components. It's not as much of a monoculture as Windows. There isn't a Linux that 90% is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's... Not great. I didn't actually think about what all these wild AV systems could do, but that's incredibly broad access.

    Maybe I'm just old, but it always strikes me as odd that you'd spend so much money on that much intrusive power that on a good day slows your machines down and on a bad day this happens.

    I get that Users are stupid. But maybe you shouldn't let users install anything. And maybe your machines shouldn't have access to things that can give them malware. Some times, you don't need everything connected to a network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn’t actually think about what all these wild AV systems could do, but that’s incredibly broad access.

    Always has been. I've clean Symantec A/V off way too many systems in my time, post BSOD. That crap came pre-loaded on so many systems, and then borked them. The problem is, that in order to actually protect system from malware, the A/V has to have full, kernel level access. So, when it goes sideways, it usually takes the system down. I've seen BSODs caused by just about every vendor's A/V or EDR product. Shit happens. Everyone makes mistakes, but when that mistake is in A/V or EDR, it usually means a BSOD.

    Maybe I’m just old, but it always strikes me as odd that you’d spend so much money on that much intrusive power that on a good day slows your machines down and on a bad day this happens.
    I get that Users are stupid. But maybe you shouldn’t let users install anything. And maybe your machines shouldn’t have access to things that can give them malware. Some times, you don’t need everything connected to a network.

    It's tough. The Internet and access to networks provides some pretty good advantages to users. But, it also means users making mistakes and executing malware. And much of the malware now is targeted at user level access; so, you can't even prevent malware by denying local admin/root. Ransomware and infostealers don't need it. A/V ends up being a bit of a backstop to some of that. Sure, it mostly is a waste of resources and can break stuff when things go bad. But, it can also catch ransomware or alert network defenders to infostealers. And either of those can result in a really, really bad day. A ransomed network is a nightmare. And credentials being stolen and not known about can lead to all kinds of bad stuff. If A/V catches or alerts you to just one or two of those events and lets you take action early, it may pay for itself (even with this sort of FUBAR situation) several times over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    It was a kernel module, there's nothing Microsoft could have done

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    The impacted Channel File in this event is 291 and will have a filename that starts with “C-00000291-” and ends with a .sys extension. Although Channel Files end with the SYS extension, they are not kernel drivers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -16 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Except not make an OS so shitty and vulnerable that it needs millions of hours and billions of dollars pumped into keeping it from being hacked in a split second. But yes nothing besides that one minor thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Companies use the same software on Linux and Mac systems, and it's a kernel module there as well; this could have happened to any OS that companies are using it on, it just happened to happen on Windows.

    Giving kernel access to outside software is always a risk; these companies chose to take that risk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The reason Windows gets attacked so much to begin with is because of its market share, not necessarily how vulnerable it is. If you want to cast as wide a net as possible while wasting as little effort as possible, why the fuck would you target the lesser used OSes? In the same vein, why would you invest so much in protecting OSes that aren’t as big of targets as Windows? Your comment sounds as ill informed as those people that think Macs can’t get viruses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's well known that windows is chocked full of security issues and ALWAYS has been. Never once implied other OSes are perfect, just better. You sound ill informed yourself, and simping for a corporation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments