Your original point is a straw man fallacy, and thus deserves no response. Get your facts straight before you give us any more of this vitriolic attitude please.

If you could stop being a prick for 10 seconds you might notice that I already did respond to your original point.

How can your expect anyone to take your argument seriously when you mix up the wife of a murder victim with the mother of a murderer and then respond by being a defensive asshole when corrected?

It's entirely possible that one day someone on the internet might say something like, "oops, I got that wrong, my bad" but today is not that day.

Better to just act like a brat.

You are accusing the widow of a rallygoer who shielded his family from harm of having a would-be assassin son. You have your facts mixed up.