131
The Death of Decentralized Email (blog.lopp.net)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Interesting history and analysis of SMTP's history. How can we prevent fedi and other open protocols from suffering the same fates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

But most people don't pay for software, especially if there are "free" and legal alternatives.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure what you mean with that or how it relates to what I said, could you elaborate?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    As I understood you said that we should make email paid to stop spammers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nono, I'm saying it costs to spam because spammers have to keep buying new domains as their previous domains get blocked or defederated.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why don't they use existing domains? I don't think 100% of them require a phone number. And didn't know it's possible to defederate an email provider.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, my point is that if spammers were to spam on the fediverse, they'd need to buy new domains constantly as their previous domains are defederated, I'm not talking about email.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So you're offering a system that requires the instance/provider admins to manually federate with others instead of the federation being enabled by default?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're misunderstanding me again. Please try reading what I said again.

    I'm not suggesting allowlist federation, though that is another tactic that could be used. I'm just saying that a spammer on the fediverse would be quickly defederated and would have to buy a new domain to keep spamming, which would probably be too expensive to justify.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, mister/miss, I read your comments again and I admit I did completely misunderstand you. I'm sorry for that and I'm extremely grateful you chose to explain your point in a friendly manner instead of starting a drama or acting in a toxic manner.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •