you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

And yet you want to put Whitmer on a national stage??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The child above me and their lack of knowledge has no relation to prudent political decision making, and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything

    A random ignoramus on the internet does not determine anything, much less what is wise for the country or the Democratic Party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything

    Are you serious? The vast majority of the voting age citizenry are ignoramuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I am serious that anecdotal evidence is not statistically significant and that, therefore, one random child is not representative of anything

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If you only look at each individual tree as a tree, you'll fail to realize you're in a forest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So if the above person was familiar with Whitmer then I should presume that most people also are?

    Your points aren't making sense. Anecdotal evidence gathered from a non-American child's comments on a random post on a fringe STEM-lord website is not representative of anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Jesus you people are insufferable. Not knowing about Whitmer is a single anecdote that is consistent with a trend that is quite obvious and so help me god if you do that sealioning bullshit demanding a peer reviewed study about Whitmers name recognition

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    consistent with a trend that is quite obvious

    What trend?

    sealioning

    Using terms like this makes one sound socially maladjusted. Which makes sense given the site we're on. Which reinforces my point that a random comment has no representative value - people on here are STEM-brained weirdos or are bots. Either way, not exactly representative of the median adult US voter

  • source
  • parent