▲ 739 ▼ Lemmies, We just reached over 10k subscribers, thank you all for helping us grow from our small humble beginning, to now the capital for US political debates and news. (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by outrageousmatter@lemmy.world [M] to c/politics@lemmy.world 175 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 90 points 3 years ago (5 children) Please rename the community to US Politics if that is the only topic allowed. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 39 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just unsubscribed after this post, I was wondering why my feed was full of local American politics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Why would you subscribe to something in the first place without knowing anything more than its title? Bizarre. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Because I have an interest in politics and I saw a couple of posts I was interested in, slim pickings with content on Lemmy for now but after I realized it's all US centric posts I've unsubscribed. Not that bizzare... permalink fedilink source parent [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think it was general politics in the begining, as the name implies. Holy fucking shit mericans aren't building a good rep with this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child) It has only existed for a month and based on all evidence has always been for just US politics. Are you sure you haven't confused it with another politics group on lemmy? Like !politics@lemmy.ml? Idk why people want to change communities to be what they want them to be instead of seeking out or making the communities they want elsewhere. Anyone can have the politics name on any other instance, unlike how reddit was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Or just join some other place if you don’t like this place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago Only perfect descriptor names allowed on the internet. Better change my email address for the irritable dudes in this thread. This is how federation works, people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) See the sidebar for regional or global politics communities. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (2 children) rename the community RedTeamBad permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why? There's no popular community named "sky is blue". There's no reason to discuss basic truths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think you summed up the community quite well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago So you agree that "red team bad" is a basic truth that everyone understands? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* Do you do anything other than whine? Boo hoo hoo, no one likes people who are trying to eradicate vulnerable minorities! Waaaah! People keep calling them nazis just because they're marching with nazi flags! permalink fedilink source parent [+] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just read the rules next time and it won’t be an issue for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pozbo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) If these kids could read they would be hella pissed at your comment asking them to take some personal responsibility for their subscriptions. Personally I don't subscribe to Better Homes and Gardens, and I don't write in to complain that they don't display apartment buildings inside. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Thanks friend. There was a hole other post this morning dedicated to people complaining about the content of the community. I do not get it. The nerve of people to just roll in and complain they don’t like the content. Just leave if you don’t like it. Nobody needs your bitching. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 39 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just unsubscribed after this post, I was wondering why my feed was full of local American politics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Why would you subscribe to something in the first place without knowing anything more than its title? Bizarre. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Because I have an interest in politics and I saw a couple of posts I was interested in, slim pickings with content on Lemmy for now but after I realized it's all US centric posts I've unsubscribed. Not that bizzare... permalink fedilink source parent [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think it was general politics in the begining, as the name implies. Holy fucking shit mericans aren't building a good rep with this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child) It has only existed for a month and based on all evidence has always been for just US politics. Are you sure you haven't confused it with another politics group on lemmy? Like !politics@lemmy.ml? Idk why people want to change communities to be what they want them to be instead of seeking out or making the communities they want elsewhere. Anyone can have the politics name on any other instance, unlike how reddit was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Why would you subscribe to something in the first place without knowing anything more than its title? Bizarre. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Because I have an interest in politics and I saw a couple of posts I was interested in, slim pickings with content on Lemmy for now but after I realized it's all US centric posts I've unsubscribed. Not that bizzare... permalink fedilink source parent [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think it was general politics in the begining, as the name implies. Holy fucking shit mericans aren't building a good rep with this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child) It has only existed for a month and based on all evidence has always been for just US politics. Are you sure you haven't confused it with another politics group on lemmy? Like !politics@lemmy.ml? Idk why people want to change communities to be what they want them to be instead of seeking out or making the communities they want elsewhere. Anyone can have the politics name on any other instance, unlike how reddit was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JohnSwanFromTheLough@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Because I have an interest in politics and I saw a couple of posts I was interested in, slim pickings with content on Lemmy for now but after I realized it's all US centric posts I've unsubscribed. Not that bizzare... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 18 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think it was general politics in the begining, as the name implies. Holy fucking shit mericans aren't building a good rep with this one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child) It has only existed for a month and based on all evidence has always been for just US politics. Are you sure you haven't confused it with another politics group on lemmy? Like !politics@lemmy.ml? Idk why people want to change communities to be what they want them to be instead of seeking out or making the communities they want elsewhere. Anyone can have the politics name on any other instance, unlike how reddit was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 9 points 3 years ago* (1 child) It has only existed for a month and based on all evidence has always been for just US politics. Are you sure you haven't confused it with another politics group on lemmy? Like !politics@lemmy.ml? Idk why people want to change communities to be what they want them to be instead of seeking out or making the communities they want elsewhere. Anyone can have the politics name on any other instance, unlike how reddit was. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child) Ah, you might be right, that's where I'm subscribed. It is still conceited to not put US in the name, but I'll just block it and not think of it again. E: Oh, that one is also filled with US drama. Guess I gotta put "world" in front then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) That one might be filled with US stuff because many of it's users are from the US, but there is no rule requiring everything be related to US politics, which seems to be the rule people wanted changed here. Even if they changed that rule here, this place would still have been 90% US politics because that is what the community that grew here wanted. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (1 child) You are arguing what happens, I am arguing what should happen, but you're right it's no harder than skiping to a new one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) We are both arguing what we each think should happen. It just so happens that in this disagreement, what I think should happen is for things to not change. I get the appeal of somehow turning a larger more active community that is similar to what you want into explicitly what you want, but that doesn't consider how that effects the majority of people who joined and are part of that community because it is already explicitly what they want. The majority of the demand for political news on lemmy is for US politics. If there was somehow a way to throttle the US politics so it didn't flood out everything else, then the bulk of the community would just find another place that wasn't doing that. All that can reasonably be done is be patient, for communities to grow and stabilize, until there are active groups available for each specific interest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] positiveWHAT@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago I think I mixed an argument here, I'm arguing names matching content. For instance it would be very legal and very cool to rename this one "US politics". The other one is organicly caused as you say, but I think the problem lies on Statians who need to calm down on the home voting, they already have a !usa@lemmy.ml for that purpose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Or just join some other place if you don’t like this place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago Only perfect descriptor names allowed on the internet. Better change my email address for the irritable dudes in this thread. This is how federation works, people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 years ago Only perfect descriptor names allowed on the internet. Better change my email address for the irritable dudes in this thread. This is how federation works, people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) See the sidebar for regional or global politics communities. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (2 children) rename the community RedTeamBad permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why? There's no popular community named "sky is blue". There's no reason to discuss basic truths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think you summed up the community quite well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago So you agree that "red team bad" is a basic truth that everyone understands? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* Do you do anything other than whine? Boo hoo hoo, no one likes people who are trying to eradicate vulnerable minorities! Waaaah! People keep calling them nazis just because they're marching with nazi flags! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why? There's no popular community named "sky is blue". There's no reason to discuss basic truths. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think you summed up the community quite well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago So you agree that "red team bad" is a basic truth that everyone understands? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Squander@lemmy.world -7 points 3 years ago (1 child) I think you summed up the community quite well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago So you agree that "red team bad" is a basic truth that everyone understands? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago So you agree that "red team bad" is a basic truth that everyone understands? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago* Do you do anything other than whine? Boo hoo hoo, no one likes people who are trying to eradicate vulnerable minorities! Waaaah! People keep calling them nazis just because they're marching with nazi flags! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world -13 points 3 years ago (1 child) Just read the rules next time and it won’t be an issue for you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pozbo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) If these kids could read they would be hella pissed at your comment asking them to take some personal responsibility for their subscriptions. Personally I don't subscribe to Better Homes and Gardens, and I don't write in to complain that they don't display apartment buildings inside. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Thanks friend. There was a hole other post this morning dedicated to people complaining about the content of the community. I do not get it. The nerve of people to just roll in and complain they don’t like the content. Just leave if you don’t like it. Nobody needs your bitching. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) If these kids could read they would be hella pissed at your comment asking them to take some personal responsibility for their subscriptions. Personally I don't subscribe to Better Homes and Gardens, and I don't write in to complain that they don't display apartment buildings inside. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Thanks friend. There was a hole other post this morning dedicated to people complaining about the content of the community. I do not get it. The nerve of people to just roll in and complain they don’t like the content. Just leave if you don’t like it. Nobody needs your bitching. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Thanks friend. There was a hole other post this morning dedicated to people complaining about the content of the community. I do not get it. The nerve of people to just roll in and complain they don’t like the content. Just leave if you don’t like it. Nobody needs your bitching. permalink fedilink source parent
