▲ 163 ▼ I mean, he's not WRONG (hexbear.net) submitted 2 years ago by Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net 82 comments fedilink hide all child comments I trust Trump about as far as I can throw him, and at the end of the day it's really the Pentagon calling the shots here not the POTUS. But dudes clearly speaking to a public sentiment here.
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago (4 children) Did he really, or did he just change who's using them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) Your counterpoint was valid when the Saudis were bombing Yemen, but ever since that wound down, there are legit less bombings. Still not voting Biden, but I just believe in giving credit where it's due. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Hestia@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Even if there's fewer bombs, it just means that those military strategies are no longer viable for US interests. It's not a moral stance, but a geopolitical one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago I agree. No interest in defending Genocide Joe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago Exactly, especially that the drones were proven to be vulnerable to anyone who have an actual military and is willing to oppose USA for real, like Russia, Iran or even Yemen (and unlike Pakistan or Iraq). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) Your counterpoint was valid when the Saudis were bombing Yemen, but ever since that wound down, there are legit less bombings. Still not voting Biden, but I just believe in giving credit where it's due. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Hestia@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Even if there's fewer bombs, it just means that those military strategies are no longer viable for US interests. It's not a moral stance, but a geopolitical one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago I agree. No interest in defending Genocide Joe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago Exactly, especially that the drones were proven to be vulnerable to anyone who have an actual military and is willing to oppose USA for real, like Russia, Iran or even Yemen (and unlike Pakistan or Iraq). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hestia@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) Even if there's fewer bombs, it just means that those military strategies are no longer viable for US interests. It's not a moral stance, but a geopolitical one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago I agree. No interest in defending Genocide Joe. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago Exactly, especially that the drones were proven to be vulnerable to anyone who have an actual military and is willing to oppose USA for real, like Russia, Iran or even Yemen (and unlike Pakistan or Iraq). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P1d40n3@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago I agree. No interest in defending Genocide Joe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago Exactly, especially that the drones were proven to be vulnerable to anyone who have an actual military and is willing to oppose USA for real, like Russia, Iran or even Yemen (and unlike Pakistan or Iraq). permalink fedilink source parent