you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 15 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Im not so sure about your number 1. Fine if otherwise they won't use one but personally I use bitwarden online for unimportant ones and a local keypass for important ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    The reason I say browser password manager is two main reasons:

    1. It is absolutely critical that it checks the domain to prevent phishing.
    2. People already have a browser and are often logged into some sort of sync. It is a small step to use it.

    So yes, if you want to use a different password manager go right ahead, as long as it checks the domain before filling the password.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What do you mean a password manager that checks the domain? Isn't the auto fill based on the domain? I can't imagine how a password manager could fill a password without checking the domain, it wouldn't know which password to fill after all. Do any actually exist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There are some password managers where you need to either manually look up passwords and copy+paste or autotype them or select the correct password from a dropdown. Some of these will come with an optional browser extension which mitigates this but some don't really tract domain metadata in a concrete way to do this linking.

    Some examples would be Pass which doesn't have any standard metadata for domain/URL info (although some informal schemes are used by various tools including browser-integration extensions) and KeePass which has the metadata but doesn't come with a browser extension by default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment