▲ 633 ▼ Anon reflects on e-sports (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (6 children) No such thing as instant. There is always some latency. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ok fine, at the speed of light then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not quite... There is some attenuation due to the medium, in this case, signals sent by wire. Even optic fiber has some attenuation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] derpgon@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Obvious troll, but I'll explain it to the rest of you guys: the latency in CRTs is so miniscule compared to LCDs that it might as well be called instant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago Not trolling, just nitpicking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cynar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago When one of your times is in milliseconds, while the other requires awareness of relativistic effects, you might as well call it instant. The propagation speed in copper is 2/3 C. With analogue monitors, that was effectively amped and thrown at the screen. The phosphate coating is the slowest part, that takes 0.25-0.5ms to respond fully. By comparison, at the time, "gaming" LCD screens were advertising 23ms response rates. permalink fedilink source parent [–] B0rax@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago Well yes, the speed of light in this case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ok fine, at the speed of light then. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not quite... There is some attenuation due to the medium, in this case, signals sent by wire. Even optic fiber has some attenuation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] derpgon@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Obvious troll, but I'll explain it to the rest of you guys: the latency in CRTs is so miniscule compared to LCDs that it might as well be called instant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago Not trolling, just nitpicking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not quite... There is some attenuation due to the medium, in this case, signals sent by wire. Even optic fiber has some attenuation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] derpgon@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Obvious troll, but I'll explain it to the rest of you guys: the latency in CRTs is so miniscule compared to LCDs that it might as well be called instant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago Not trolling, just nitpicking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derpgon@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 child) Obvious troll, but I'll explain it to the rest of you guys: the latency in CRTs is so miniscule compared to LCDs that it might as well be called instant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago Not trolling, just nitpicking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago Not trolling, just nitpicking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago When one of your times is in milliseconds, while the other requires awareness of relativistic effects, you might as well call it instant. The propagation speed in copper is 2/3 C. With analogue monitors, that was effectively amped and thrown at the screen. The phosphate coating is the slowest part, that takes 0.25-0.5ms to respond fully. By comparison, at the time, "gaming" LCD screens were advertising 23ms response rates. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] B0rax@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago Well yes, the speed of light in this case. permalink fedilink source parent