Technology

technology@lemmy.world

87,464 readers

15,941 active

3,404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from accurately answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds (fortune.com)

submitted 3 years ago* by Gsus4@lemmy.one to c/technology@lemmy.world

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can we discuss how it's possible that the paid model (gpt4) got worse and the free one (gpt3.5) got better? Is it because the free one is being trained on a larger pool of users or what?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gsus4@lemmy.one [S] 3 points 3 years ago

True, checking whether a number is prime is very limited in scope for chargpt, but this is in line with other reports of progressive dumbing down.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4