▲ 422 ▼ Study finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projects (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/programming@programming.dev 135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 37 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s more about poor planning vs good planning. Of course a project with good planning is more likely to deliver in time. It’s just to that poor planners tend to use “agile” as an excuse for their poor planning. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] paf0@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago In the days before Agile the Waterfall projects failed too. Though not necessarily for being late, they failed because they didn't deliver the thing that the business thought they were building, they delivered something else due to a misunderstanding. If nothing more, Agile gives more visibility into the process and allows for course correction. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] paf0@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago In the days before Agile the Waterfall projects failed too. Though not necessarily for being late, they failed because they didn't deliver the thing that the business thought they were building, they delivered something else due to a misunderstanding. If nothing more, Agile gives more visibility into the process and allows for course correction. permalink fedilink source parent