you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Agree with this

    I am not a native speaker and I never associated gimp with a sex meaning, even if my vocabulary is pretty expanded.

    It could be called "DesirePix 2.0" or "SeductionStudio 4.0" but the main problem is that it gives a worse user experience than using Adobe Photoshop 5.0 on windows 95, on every single aspect. Features, speed, UI, ease of use, and so on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Disclaimer: it's not that I'm denigrating the devs, making a program like gimp is super fucking hard and as a lousy programmer I could never be able to make it better. Ideally, it would need some talented designers to develop a more usable UI.

    I see comparisons to photopea, but that's a UI clone of Photoshop and that is not really wanted. It also didn't come with technical debt from the 90s

  • source
  • parent