you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Melbourne already has a defined urban growth boundary, but it still leaves the opportunity for a lot of low density fringe suburbs, which makes the provision of infrastructure and services cost prohibitive.

Hopefully the push towards 70% established/30% new areas will help address urban sprawl and get people living closer to services.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Melbourne has had various growth boundaries since I can remember. It also has plans for an airport rail. Both of these are fairy tales waved around by politicians occasionally and them dumped after the elections.

  • source
  • parent