you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I find it strange that many people here are against this when the alternative is a surgical treatment that often can't be easily reversed, and even when it is, often lowers the likelihood they will have a kid.

Chemical solutions are way better in that regard because if they are done right they don't damage any tissue and their affects are temporary.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    I'm not against it but you'd have to be crazy to trust a guy who doesn't want to use a condom because he swears he's on the pill. It seems like it opens up a wild new avenue for sexual assault.

    The reality is that the consequences of sex are asymmetric. I suppose this is an interesting option for couples in a relationship though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -33 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Fuck yes, sexual repression what a banger idea that is modern and haven't even been considered for literally thousands of years and proven abusive to exactly every human being on the planet

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Oh yeah, I'll just tell my wife that we're never having sex again because we've now got enough kids. I'm sure this will be a healthy and emotionally viable way of strengthening our relationship over the next 30 years or so until the menopause.

  • source
  • parent