هي إل صبايا هي إل همج

“hay il sabaya hay il hamaj”

“Sabaya” is essentially referring to them as young female captives of war. So in the context of the video posted, they are referring to the IOF soldiers as literal “Young female prisoners of war.” They also call them “hamaj” which could mean “barbarians” or “savages”

So what is happening is that Zionists are intentionally misinterpreting their words. The term reached western media a few years ago when Isis was terrorizing the Yazidis, but Isis is notably not Hamas and when Isis used the word they used it to mean young female slaves,

I will attempt an English example of a similar way to misconstrue a word like this. I think the following is a decent approximation on how the meaning of a word can vary drastically given context but not be incorrect to use in any of these contexts:

“He’s mine for the next 30 minutes.”

Meaning:

You will have physical, slave-like ownership over him for the next 30 minutes

You and him will be sharing time on a task together for the next 30 minutes

You will have his attention for the next 30 minutes

You will be alone participating on the same task for the next 30 minutes

You will be his sole director of activity for the next 30 minutes

And so on and so on. There are so many ways to interpret the word “mine” in this sentence that the context is extremely important. The fact that the women in the video are called savages/barbarians says pretty much everything it needs to: they are prisoners of war. There’s not necessarily any mention of anything sexual, though somebody acting in bad faith could imply that it was, just like in my example above.