you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 113 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Remember the people suggesting to change the Hell Divers negative reviews because Sony listened?

They have learned nothing

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Sounds like they will be bringing the PSN requirement back for future games maybe. The only thing they probably learned was to announce the requirement for account linking from the start and make it more vissible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Is that worth the loss of sales from those 177 or whatever it was extra countries? That's the part that confuses me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I think for the executives the only reason to release old games on pc is to bring more players to their console, and if they can't have a psn account that means they will nvr buy a PlayStation. That's my guess

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Probably bullshui but there's a 3rd option that they have legal reasons not to operate servers in some of those regions and helldivers was violating those restrictions. It takes more than a week to review the legal code in 180 countries, review the internal policies in place and audit the game for any violations all with the added complexity that arrowhead and sony are independent entities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Yeah I'm sure changing negative reviews is a factor here and totally wouldn't have been an incentive for future good behavior

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Their incentive is money. All this is teaching them is that they need to find a different approach to do the same thing.

    The AAA outfits are trash and should die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Bad reviews tend to lead to worse sales...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Sorry, the argument is they should have zero consequences for trying something reviled because they abandoned it later? And that will make them not try similar things later, because of reasons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The "argument" is that a few people said people should reward them doing the right thing eventually but others somehow think that's evil or some weird ass shit.

    It's not complicated, as much as Internet weirdos want it to be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They are being rewarded for doing the right thing simply by people not continuing to refund.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Ok it's just weird to me that people like you have some moral objection to a slightly different attitude applied to reviews. It's not something worth talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments