you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Yeah I'm sure changing negative reviews is a factor here and totally wouldn't have been an incentive for future good behavior

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Their incentive is money. All this is teaching them is that they need to find a different approach to do the same thing.

    The AAA outfits are trash and should die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Bad reviews tend to lead to worse sales...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Sorry, the argument is they should have zero consequences for trying something reviled because they abandoned it later? And that will make them not try similar things later, because of reasons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The "argument" is that a few people said people should reward them doing the right thing eventually but others somehow think that's evil or some weird ass shit.

    It's not complicated, as much as Internet weirdos want it to be

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They are being rewarded for doing the right thing simply by people not continuing to refund.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Ok it's just weird to me that people like you have some moral objection to a slightly different attitude applied to reviews. It's not something worth talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments