▲ 20 ▼ Critical thinking is hard (exploding-heads.com) submitted 3 years ago by masterofballs@exploding-heads.com to c/dankmemes@exploding-heads.com 13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago (8 children) The government's authority used to be derived from the people. The people who developed the republic never could have imagined the immense bureaucratic superstate that exists and overrides the will of the people and often the will of the elected officials. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) If it was the will of the people laws that the people want would pass. Like legalizing weed. It's mostly the will of the corporations because they fund the politicians. There is basically zero correlation between what the people want and whether a law is passed but a very high correlation between what the corporations want and what laws are passed. For example, vaccine corporations having zero liability for injuries. Take a popular vote and see if that would pass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Touche. If the government was following the will of the people, then daylight savings time would be a distant memory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) An even better example. Daylight savings is retarded. It is always good bread for programmers when they change time. All those scheduling programs got to build that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ihatetroons@exploding-heads.com 2 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 2 points 3 years ago I think we are coming at the same problem from different angles. Which is fine. I just describe the same problem differently. permalink fedilink source parent [+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago That's a good point too. Especially since "The people" were a subset of the actual residents at the time. Back then "The people" were male land owners. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago (8 children) The government's authority used to be derived from the people. The people who developed the republic never could have imagined the immense bureaucratic superstate that exists and overrides the will of the people and often the will of the elected officials. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) If it was the will of the people laws that the people want would pass. Like legalizing weed. It's mostly the will of the corporations because they fund the politicians. There is basically zero correlation between what the people want and whether a law is passed but a very high correlation between what the corporations want and what laws are passed. For example, vaccine corporations having zero liability for injuries. Take a popular vote and see if that would pass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Touche. If the government was following the will of the people, then daylight savings time would be a distant memory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) An even better example. Daylight savings is retarded. It is always good bread for programmers when they change time. All those scheduling programs got to build that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ihatetroons@exploding-heads.com 2 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 2 points 3 years ago I think we are coming at the same problem from different angles. Which is fine. I just describe the same problem differently. permalink fedilink source parent [+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago That's a good point too. Especially since "The people" were a subset of the actual residents at the time. Back then "The people" were male land owners. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children) If it was the will of the people laws that the people want would pass. Like legalizing weed. It's mostly the will of the corporations because they fund the politicians. There is basically zero correlation between what the people want and whether a law is passed but a very high correlation between what the corporations want and what laws are passed. For example, vaccine corporations having zero liability for injuries. Take a popular vote and see if that would pass. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Touche. If the government was following the will of the people, then daylight savings time would be a distant memory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) An even better example. Daylight savings is retarded. It is always good bread for programmers when they change time. All those scheduling programs got to build that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ihatetroons@exploding-heads.com 2 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 2 points 3 years ago I think we are coming at the same problem from different angles. Which is fine. I just describe the same problem differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 4 points 3 years ago (2 children) Touche. If the government was following the will of the people, then daylight savings time would be a distant memory. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) An even better example. Daylight savings is retarded. It is always good bread for programmers when they change time. All those scheduling programs got to build that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ihatetroons@exploding-heads.com 2 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) An even better example. Daylight savings is retarded. It is always good bread for programmers when they change time. All those scheduling programs got to build that in. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] ihatetroons@exploding-heads.com 2 points 3 years ago* [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 2 points 3 years ago I think we are coming at the same problem from different angles. Which is fine. I just describe the same problem differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] masterofballs@exploding-heads.com [S] 2 points 3 years ago I think we are coming at the same problem from different angles. Which is fine. I just describe the same problem differently. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago That's a good point too. Especially since "The people" were a subset of the actual residents at the time. Back then "The people" were male land owners. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 2 points 3 years ago That's a good point too. Especially since "The people" were a subset of the actual residents at the time. Back then "The people" were male land owners. permalink fedilink source parent