▲ 152 ▼ What is the Anti Commercial-Al license and why do people keep adding it to their comments? (lemmy.ml) submitted 2 years ago by Pacrat173@lemmy.ml to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world 141 comments fedilink hide all child comments I know what the Creative Commons is but not this new thing or why it keeps popping up in comments on Lemmy
[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yeah that's not the source, that's still output. You don't seem to understand how LLMs work and yet have taken a bizarre stance on it anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Previous work has already shown that image generators can be forced to generate examples from their training data—including copyrighted works—and an early OpenAI LLM produced contact information belonging to a researcher You don't seem to be able to read the articles, yet have responded with junk anyway. Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago You know that's not the LLM's 'source' right? It's still output. Do you mean the training data? Is that what you mean by CoPilot should be open source? If CoPilot has learned from something GPL then everything else it outputs, or perhaps specifically its training data - should be GPL? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] onlinepersona@programming.dev -11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Previous work has already shown that image generators can be forced to generate examples from their training data—including copyrighted works—and an early OpenAI LLM produced contact information belonging to a researcher You don't seem to be able to read the articles, yet have responded with junk anyway. Anti Commercial-AI license permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago You know that's not the LLM's 'source' right? It's still output. Do you mean the training data? Is that what you mean by CoPilot should be open source? If CoPilot has learned from something GPL then everything else it outputs, or perhaps specifically its training data - should be GPL? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago You know that's not the LLM's 'source' right? It's still output. Do you mean the training data? Is that what you mean by CoPilot should be open source? If CoPilot has learned from something GPL then everything else it outputs, or perhaps specifically its training data - should be GPL? permalink fedilink source parent