1487
Welp that answers a lot of why all .ml are down (i.imgur.com)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/technology@lemmy.world
521 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://very.bignutty.xyz/notes/9hf13it1ced3b2za

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 years ago (14 children)

Unfortunately that has always been the nature of TLDs

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    It’s less sketchy if you pay for a domain through a reputable registrar

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    The issue here isn't the registrar though right? It's that the TLD is being repossessed by the government of the country it's meant to be associated with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    I think the point is that a reputable registrar wouldn't sell domains like these in the first place... But I'm not saying that's actually the case :/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Governments are unpredictable. It's not the registrar's job to mitigate that unpredictability to their customers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Idk, I feel like we're only saying this because it's Mali... If it were .US or .CN people would be like "well, duh"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Every country gets to decide how tight of a grip they have on their TLD. Some sell it for some extra income (like Tuvalu) while others hang onto it for government or domestic use only

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yeah, and I'd say going with any of the ones that sell it or leave it free is a risk because you never know when their regime might change and the new one might want more of an official internet presence. Unless there's a 2nd level domain it's all under (like co.uk), you should assume they'll want it back at some point. This could apply more to popular domains that some governments could see as free traffic if they reclaim them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Not really. When you pay for .us domain you have it for a certain number of years. If the US tried to suddenly yank those back and violate the outstanding contracts for x number of years, there would most likely be lawsuits and an injunction from a federal judge blocking the action until there are hearings, etc. It would be a whole thing. If you simply couldn't renew your .us domain anymore, that's something you would know ahead of time and could plan for. It wouldn't just vanish one day.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent