you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago

And according to the counter suit, carol is allowed to call him a rapist.

Remember, you don’t have to be convicted of rape to be a rapist, you are not innocent and then magically guilty. It is merely a presumption of innocence until proven so, but that’s a procedural thing to prevent the courts from infringing on rights. It has absolutely nothing to do with the true facts of guilt.

It’s not defamation.

  • source
  • parent