this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
1844 points (98.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

2932 readers
789 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Tap water is not just water. Water has a bunch of other things in it besides water. The main reason I can think to choose a different water supplier than the cheapest is the water quality. If the cheap supplier is gonna crap up all the water for everyone else, what's anyone incentive not to go with the cheap supplier? Doesn't that pretty quickly devolve into a monopoly?

With electricity, it is just electricity and people have opinions about how that electricity is generated. But even there, it's usually not a good thing. It leads to high pressure, scammy sales tactics that result in higher bills for no benefit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hypothetically, what if my electricity, in my shitty profit seeking corporation, cycles inconsistently?

What if my equipment at my rinky-dink substation fluctuates between something absurd like 40hz to 70hz.

This would be extremely dirty electricity\ electromagnetic pollution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you're all using the same wires, you're subjected to those problems even if you don't contract with them. So multiple suppliers doesn't fix the issue. It just introduces more suppliers who can have those problems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Exactly! A shitty race to the bottom even for electricity is my point.

Never under estimate capitalism's ability to create a shittier alternative, is all I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That would destroy the entire grid and a lot of equipment. It's why texas had rolling blackouts a few winters ago, it's a fine balance between supply and demand to maintain stable voltage and frequency. Failure to do so can result in a LOT of damage. If you don't have enough supply, you have to reduce demand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Why would this electric company care? Would the company not sell the customers a solution?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can be solved by putting a certain quality requirement for putting water into the pipes. Suppliers can compete on price.

It's not realistic to have multiple pipe systems covering the same area. Digging pipes is very expensive. Digging multiple networks of pipes is insane. This solution is the best compromise to have multiple suppliers serve in the same area.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

If the only difference is price, how does that not just devolve into a monopoly or shitty sales tactics to try to trick people into paying more for the same product?