WheelcharArtist

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

who would have thought that nothing happens if we do nothing...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago

that actually looks kind of weird

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Muskboxes

like that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i like the fact that it is not karma driven. like vote on me how you want i don't look at my karma and care at all how people react

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Valve? Mozilla?...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

IPv6 addressed the necessity of NAT by adding an obscene amount of possible IPs

that is correct but doesn't change the fact that nat came afterwards as a workaround und now the ip stack goes back to it's roots without a nat workaround.

It didn’t start actually being seriously used until ~2006/7ish.

true but still nowadays it isn't even slow anymore just refusal

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Iv6 doesn't try to simplify routing and remove nat. that's just how things work. Nat is a workaround for ipv4.

Ipv6 is around since 1998. that's not slow to adopt, at that point it is just plain refusal from some because of the costs you mentionend

20
CanG-O-Mat (cangomat.av-gruenden.de)
 

Hi, does anyone know how to get the Fenix A320 for Microsofts Flight Simulator running?

view more: next ›