[–] 22 points 2 years ago

Great I really wanted that.

I wonder how this will affect the right to be forgotten. It's not like theyre going to un-train any models or remove any derivative content

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I think we have very different ways of enjoying art. I don't really understand how it's possible for at to have nothing with the artist's views, unless it were totally random. Actually, even that would be saying something.

    But I get the feeling that we look at art pretty differently.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I got that, I was just repeating the number. My point is that leather is more durable than is necessary for a consumer electronic, especially one from Apple which has made planned obsolescence continuous innovation a cornerstone of their business.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Why I would separate the artist from what they made? I'm interested in what they have to say about the world. That's the point of art.

    It's not just content to make me happy until the next hit. Like, it has meaning.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›