[–] 3 points 3 days ago

Chatrie v. United States (2026) ruled that obtaining location history from tech companies via geofence warrants constitutes a Fourth Amendment search requiring a warrant, regardless of whether the data was voluntarily shared with a third party.

If the camera would take pictures, and be bound by law to only send stolen plates to police and then delete all other footage within minutes. i honestly wouldn't have an issue, having a big searchable database of peoples driving habits and locations is ABSOLUTELY a fucking problem > sh.itjust.works

  • source
  • parent
  • context