all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

In reality she would have sacked half of them without even being in the room and had them escorted out by the same security that protects her. Ain't nobody getting anywhere near her with a guillotine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    She would mumble something about needing to streamline the company's processes to remain competitive. Not to the workers, of course-- To a board of directors who are barely paying attention, other than making sure number goes up.

    The workers would just be informed that half of them are no longer employed there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I've never met a person who was both into Ayn Rand and also rational.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I was into Ayn Rand in high school and in retrospect I guess I'd say that, given the things I thought were important, I was rational. But certainly my values weren't quite...I dunno...human?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    See, this is why egoism makes way more sense than objectivism as a selfishness-based philosophy.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (9 children)

    Just one caveat - if you double production, you're not doubling your income or profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I mean you might be, depending upon what % of the total market you operate and what the exact inputs of the new method are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    No, you never will without increasing prices to cover the additional overhead of increased production.

    Remember, only the machine is doubling efficiency, but operations has to increase to handle the new output and resources required.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    But some operational costs (I.e. Ground Rent, Marketing, Legal Fees, IP Costs etc...) do not scale with increased output.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not if most of you cost is labor, you'll be approaching marginal increase in costs but still certainly of double income.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The labor costs aren't going away, just shifting. You have to increase employment in other areas to handle a 100% increase in product output.

    Besides the fact that labor costs are rarely a large enough portion of a manufacturer's budget to make that big of a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    For the longest time I used to shelve Rand next to Marx on my bookshelf. I've read both at various points (might as well learn the source material if you're going to argue about politics...), but it tickled me as a centrist to annoy their ghosts equally.

  • source