Link: LIB

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 48 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Simple response: "without linking wikipedia, please define fascism"

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I've got Umberto Eco's essay but I know there are others with different approaches to defining fascism. I'm about ready to study another, do you have any to recommend?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago*

    The works of Georgi Dimitrov are the go-to for defining fascism hands down.

    "Fascism is not a form of state power "standing above both classes – the proletariat and the bourgeoisie," as Otto Bauer, for instance, has asserted.

    It is not "the revolt of the petty bourgeoisie which has captured the machinery of the state," as the British Socialist Brailsford declares.

    No, fascism is not a power standing above class, nor government of the petty bourgeoisie or the lumpen-proletariat over finance capital. Fascism is the power of finance capital itself.

    It is the organization of terrorist vengeance against the working class and the revolutionary section of the peasantry and intelligentsia. In foreign policy, fascism is jingoism in its most brutal form, fomenting bestial hatred of other nations.... >

    The development of fascism, and the fascist dictatorship itself, assume different forms in different countries, according to historical, social and economic conditions and to the national peculiarities, and the international position of the given country."

    Give The Fascist Offensive and the Tasks of the Communist International, a read

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago

    Eco's analysis lacks fascism's focus on anticommunism, which is the whole reason capital first tolerates and later embraces fascism. This is the defining characteristic, especially if you try to parse out what separates fascism from a mere dictatorship or an absolutist monarchy.

    There are also some points he makes that are things everyone does to varying degrees. You can drop the "the enemy is both too strong and too weak" on anyone who talks about the strengths and weaknesses of an opponent, for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    That article from Jewish Currents is really interesting. It's the first time I've heard of double genocide theory. This explains that whole thing with Canadian Parliament applauding that old SS soldier a few years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Didn’t that happen like a few months ago? Or does Canada just have multiple incidents of applauding Nazis?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    This reminds me of the bit from the Qanon Anonymous episode about the Obama produced movie Leave the World Behind. Julian says something like "you get out of the theater and you're somehow 10 years older and not just you but the whole world has lost a decade of its time"

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    fascism is when i dont like things ive been told were bad

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I swear. The words "by definition" have lost all meaning. You can't just slap a "by definition" onto an assertion like flex tape just because it sounds stronger lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    The fuck did I just read? wtf-am-i-reading

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    These are the same people who think "dictatorship of the proletariat" is automatically bad because it has the word 'dictator' in it.

    And then they say shit like "by definition."

  • source