Reddit has never turned a profit in nearly 20 years, but filed to go public anyway::Reddit, the message board site known for its chronically online userbase and for originating much internet discourse, filed for its long-anticipated initial public offering on Thursday.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

Problem is the entire concept of a site like reddit being "for profit" in the first place.

I know we all wax nostalgic about the old non-centralized Internet with its various small websites and forums, but one thing I do genuinely miss from those days was that those places existed because the people running them wanted them to exist. They had ads or took donations to keep the lights on, but no one was looking to get rich. Passion, not profit.

The decentralized internet was run more by people, the centralized internet is run by board rooms.

That's why I like the idea of the fediverse. That is why this place feels familiar to those early days.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I still remember clicking a bunch of irrelevant ads for knives and other weird shit on a forum I visited regularly because the owner said they get slightly more money when ads get clicked on site.

    I'm doing my part!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago*

    Ads don’t even bother me inherently. It’s part the maximum obnoxiousness of them these days, of course. But most of all, if I do manage to see an ad (like in a mobile app), I get irrationally annoyed at the fact that it is supposed to be tailored to me and yet here I am looking at a 20 second unskippable ad for something I would never in a million years care for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    There was a simple version of reddit that could be profitable without compromising what made it enjoyable for the users, but the suits had to go chasing after a bunch of fads (remember bow they tries to produce a series of video AMAs?).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The "old internet" hasn't gone away. It's easier than ever for your average person to set up their own website. Look at all the shit you can do with WordPress, usually for free and usually with minimal technical knowledge or experience. Reddit/Facebook/Google/etc have done nothing at all to prevent people from doing that. The people still choose reddit/Facebook/google. I don't know we're supposed to change that without actually removing people's freedom of choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    The people still choose reddit/Facebook/google. I don't know we're supposed to change that without actually removing people's freedom of choice.

    In my opinion/experience, it's for a few reasons. People are marketed these centralized platforms, typically they're very/fairly simple to use, and those platforms already have an established userbase. Combined with the other factors, the userbase will keep growing, which also incentivizes Even more users to adopt the platform.

    For most people, there's no incentive to use some small random forum. And these small random forums aren't typically run for profit, meaning people aren't paying for ads for their niche forum or hobby website because it's just a hobby, not a business run for profit. Whereas people will see countless ads for Instagram or TikTok. Typically, people who don't block ads, and use these sorts of media didn't care enough to bother looking for alternative platforms, they couldn't even be bothered to set up an adblocker.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I have no qualms with a person making a comfortable living off of building a website like Reddit. None at all. I’d rather have someone who’s able to dedicate their full time and even a team to making an experience great for users and making a very healthy living off of it.

    But yea, spez is a greedy fuck and the ELT at Reddit are all greedy fucks. Reddit has no business being a publicly traded company.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 140 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    honestly, it has the word AI somewhere in their last year activities, even if they don't do it themselves.

    Investors are dumb as fuck, they know nothing about anything other than keywords and hype trains, so with the AI keyword they might go crazy on this.

    I keep saying it, the stock market is a mistake for humanity, it doesn't make sense to put a gambling house in the core of the world economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago

    But it isn't gambling ... It's managed and calculated financing in companies that need the investment in order to grow

    I'm kidding, this is sarcasm .. the stock market is a freakin casino with built in cheats and frauds that favor the rich and wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago*

    The stock market, much like capitalism in general, is useful if regulated properly, but the inherent corrosive nature of human greed on any regulatory system will eventually erode those regulations down and let this shit run rampant. There are genuine benefits to it, but they're buried beneath the sheer scale of wealth begetting more wealth at the expense of everyone else.

    Part of it is that, to spite it being "gambling", it sure doesn't feel like there's a lot of losing going on with the biggest players. They don't seem to need to be as careful as you or I would need to be. It'd be one thing if it was fair gambling, but it isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Perhaps if the ceo wasn't making like 200m a year, it would show some profits

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Not to be that guy, but I think he makes 300k and was given 193m in stock options last year based on some whack evaluation.

    Still an utterly insane number, hope they get crushed on the public market

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    but they've cleaned the site up so much! I mean they got rid of all of us, didn't they

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Because the stock market is a scam and whoever is valuing these companies so high is clearly in on it. Any company that has no profit is should be worth nothing in an IPO.

    Edit: strikethrough, to be more clearly an opinion.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If a business was actually losing money for 20 years straight then how does it continue to grow? Think about Amazon and how long it wasn't profitable despite being one of the largest businesses ever in recorded history.

    It's a business scam that's a legal way of pay significantly less taxes than they normally would.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    dont forget getting to gamble with other peoples forced retirement accounts! yay!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Haven't most places moved to 401ks for this reason? I'd never participate in a pension and I imagine the vast majority of those working in the tech industry are smart enough not to as well

    I could be wrong I'm basing all this on assumptions about others intelligence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    wouldnt it be cool if retirement didnt rely on the market, at all? in any capacity. like, if we werent forced to go with a 'lower risk' tier of the house of cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Pensions are amazing, why the hell would you not want one? 401ks are nice, too, and ideally you find a gig that does both. Yes, there are some companies that have fucked their employees' pensions over, but those are in the minority and doing so is illegal, so those companies tend to be doing other illegal shit as well (e.g. the infamous case of Enron).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    If a business was actually losing money for 20 years straight then how does it continue to grow?

    It's because it keeps getting funded by venture capitalists, as far as I understand. Keeping it afloat because they believe it will eventually bring a return on that investment.

    I feel like investments used to be a reasonable thing. Like some rich fella or a fund organization or something invested in a thing and then a little later (couple years at most I would say) it's profitable and can start paying back the investment (which was essentially a loan).

    Now it's become more and more pyramid-scheme-esque. You start with a small funding round to get a bit of growth but you still grow faster than profits can keep up with. Then you get a slightly bigger funding round but you also grow slightly faster. Then you repeat this for 20 years and then you have Reddit's situation I suppose.

    But it seems crazy. Why is there so much money in the world being spent for this potential return? I get it, investments do enable innovation and new businesses and all that. That's the supposed benefit of capitalism. But it's starting to feel ridiculous when it goes on for so long without ever producing a surplus of value.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Given Spez's salary I'd say they definitely make a buck.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I think people don’t understand just how good Facebook is at ads. Their relevance engine is unlike anything else. If something 1/3 as effective could be done to Reddit, this place would be making billions.

    I’ve run ads on Facebook and I’ve run ads on Reddit. Facebook was like a massage with a happy ending, and Resdit was like being shat on by a vagrant.

    There’s absolutely no reason Reddit couldn’t be making tons of money with as much as they know about hobbies and interests in general, and the free traffic they are able to draw to such a mountain of niche content.

    I hope not to see Reddit go the way of Facebook. But to say it couldn’t make a profit is not true.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Fucking arseholes. It has been my imaginary home since it started and now I have to use fucking mastodon and bluesky fucking dicks.
    On the plus side, Lemmy has been getting really good recently

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    I hope their IPO comes crashing down in flames.

    Didn't think I'd be here hoping for the failure of what used to be my favorite website but here we are.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Most tech companies aren't profitable when they go public, that's been true as long as the tech industry existed.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I smell a short position in my future after that IPO...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why on earth would they give those sweet pre-IPO shares up to the unwashed masses if they thought there was even a remote chance the IPO would at least break even?

    I suspect it's because they're worried that their users are going to short them and encourage others to do the same, so they're trying to get them involved and committed. They don't want WSB causing shit. My guess is that the share prices will do pretty well, at least initially. There are plenty of ignorant investors who want to get in on the next big tech stock. Just a guess though, I don't know enough about this stuff to invest in stocks myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Who else is going to short?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Hoe does this work. If a company has not made a profit in 20 years. How is it not bankrupt?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You keep telling the next investor it'll be profitable soon. I believe the guy that came up with this scheme first went to prison or something, but afterwards we all collectively decided we were cool with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [B] 3 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Reddit, the message board site known for its chronically online userbase and for originating much internet discourse, filed for its long-anticipated initial public offering on Thursday.

    The filing comes nearly three years after Reddit hired its first chief financial officer, and executives, including co-founder and CEO Steve Huffman, began publicly discussing the possibility of an IPO to further elevate the company’s profile.

    Reddit, which has called itself the “front page of the internet,” is a social media veteran: the company started in 2005, the year that college roommates Huffman and Ohanian graduated from the University of Virginia.

    In 2021, Reddit caused mass market upheaval when a community of day traders on the platform called WallStreetBets began buying up shares of GameStop in an effort to hurt hedge funds that bet against the stock.

    Thursday’s filing offers the most detailed look yet at the state of Reddit’s business, which seeks to grow beyond the traditional ad-supported model upon which most social platforms continue to heavily rely.

    And while Reddit said it expects its total addressable market in advertising to grow to $1.4 trillion by 2027, it also acknowledged in the filing’s risk factors disclosure that it has “a history of net losses and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.”


    The original article contains 933 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›