From the Outlook Android app
WE VALUE YOUR PRIVACY!*
^*no^ ^we^ ^don't.^ ^not^ ^even^ ^a^ ^little.^
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
690 points (98.5% liked)
Privacy
31886 readers
672 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
No, I think they're being literal. There is value that they want in your privacy.
- We value your privacy (in a twisted way)
- Our company's value (increases with access to) your privacy
Or the idea of the title and text was to create a paradox like: The following statement is true. // The preceding statement is false.
We value your privacy. We're selling it.
Gold
797 partners? Might need to get tested haha
whoever put that "reject all"s are mandatory should be getting praised.
it would suck to individually reject those 797 "partners".
This button doesn't often work as you'd expect. Websites/Apps can (and do) still approve so called "legitimate interest" option. The only way to be sure is to click "manage preferences" and dig in to check if legitimate interest is enabled. Sometimes you'll see "object all" in there, but some websites require to manually disable legitimate interest for each of the hundreds of partners manually.
this could be its own twilight zone episode
fuck
Recently a pirate website for music, free-mp3-download.net got updated with this crap included. You have to toggle it off every time. All vendors separately. I took a stopwatch, it takes me around 2 minutes and 50 seconds.
Sounds friendly.
To be fair, free-mp3-download.net is not a URL I would voluntarily go to. I mean seriously...
I don't judge by domain names.
It's also listed in the top 2 at FMHY: https://fmhy.net/audiopiracyguide#download-sites
And best site at DB0 megathread ([email protected]): https://rentry.co/megathread-music#free-mp3-download
Give me your wallet! Can't refuse, I have a legitimate interest
load more comments
(5 replies)
There will be some lawsuit in the future somewhere in Europe. And the judge will rightfully rule that you can't get an "informed consent" from your users for 800 tracking companies just by letting them click a button with dark patterns.
Europe for sure. USA? Better chance of the president smoking rock at the state of the union. Land of the fee and all that.
"We respect your privacy to the extent the law requires us to. Maybe."
I respect that you want it to be a small birthday party.
Me and my 718 closest friends will be there..
Anything ran by Microsoft is a privacy concern (includes Windows, Teams, npm, GitHub)
npm?! Since when?
Looks like early last year. News to me, too
Yup. It’s privately held, not a community or non-profit-held registry.
"We value your privacy". Proceeds to not value any kind of privacy at all
"We valuated your privacy", more like
At least they are (forced to be) honest ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I like the rest of the wording, too. They'd like to process arbitrary data from the device. And third parties act out of their own motivation as long as it is their legitimate interest...
Use 'REJECT ALL'.
REJECT ALL button doesn't often work as you'd expect. Websites/Apps can (and do) still approve so called "legitimate interest" option. The only way to be sure is to click "manage preferences" and dig in to check if legitimate interest is enabled. Sometimes you'll see "object all" in there, but you will find notice that some websites require to manually disable legitimate interest for each of the hundreds of partners manually.
Hehe, keep up spreading that important info 💪✌️. Most people aren't aware and this practice should be illegal. Reject ALL... Every word they say is just a fucking lie.
That's why I reject all in Firefox settings along with wiping everything at close
I guess 'Reject All' means just 'reject all of the above', and there are are additional terms that are binding, they just spared you from handling those with this popup, or why is that kind of thing legal?
They do value your privacy very expensively!
What's worse is when it's accept all or manage preferences, and you manually have to turn off cookies for all 718 partners individually, every time you open the app.
They do infact value your privacy. Only to them it is of low value
They spelled "violate" wrong.
Use Fairmail/ K-9 mail instead.
Even better ~~skiff~~, protonmail, tuta
I'd say they're not lying. They do value your privacy. It's making them, and 797 of their closest friends, a lot of money.
That's why F-Droid exists.
"If you have to ask, you do not respect my privacy"
Imagine applying to private university and reading their privacy policy, where they clearly say, how they get your private information from third parties and share all info with third parties. And when you ask administrator, how can i prevent them from doing that, they say, that they do not share/get info from/to thirdparties. Bravo
load more comments
(1 replies)
Please dont post pictures of text without linking to the source or transcribing it. Blind folks can't read it.
Genuine question, can screen readers not parse image text in 2024? I personally use some image text to text copy programs on Linux to help speed up my development workflow, so it seems good screen readers have already had this for years?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is this Facebook?
It's Outlook trying to be like Facebook
I guess I appreciate that there's a "reject all" button and it's not grayed out... Not sure if it's because they were required to not hide it, though.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›