First, they restricted code search without logging in so I'm using sourcegraph But now, I cant even view discussions or wiki without logging in.

It was a nice run

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The only thing surprising is that it took Microsoft almost three years to turn on the shit-spigot.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There's nothing wrong with it honestly, and OP seems to be giving bad info.. And trust me, I'm not a fan of Microsoft lol

    i literally just tested Discussions and wiki in private browsing mode on a few repos and they work. Which just proves it's not a big deal that needing a login isn't an issue. Seems nobody actually upvoting doesn't have a login

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 82 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    Honestly for selfhosters, I can't recommend enough setting up an instance of Gitea. You'll be very happy hosting your code and such there, then just replicate it to github or something if you want it on the big platforms.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 149 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Just so you're aware, Gitea was taken over by a for-profit company. Which is why it was forked and Forgejo was formed. If you don't use Github as a matter of principle, then you should switch to Forgejo instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Damnit of course it was. Thanks for letting me know, now I'll have to redo my 100+ repos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Changing the remote should be fairly trivial with enough bash skills

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Forgejo for you chap.

    Honestly I'm kind of surprised that Gitea is still being recommended on Lemmy, it's been a while since Gitea was acquired and the community has been raging since. Lemmy is regressing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    +1 for Gitea. It's super lightweight, and works really well! I recently switched to Gitlab simply because I wanted experience with hosting it, but Gitea is much lighter and easier to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    The writing was on the wall when they established a generative AI using everyone's code and of course without asking anyone for permission.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 47 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    I moved all my open source projects to Gitlab the day Microsoft announced they were acquiring Github.

    (I wish in retrospect I'd taken the time to research and decide on the right host. I likely would have gone to Codeberg instead of Gitlab had I done so. But Gitlab's still better than Github. And I don't really know for sure that Codeberg was even around back when Microsoft acquired Github.)

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 2 years ago*

    My first impression of gitlab was offputting because I was using hardened firefox and couldnt get past through cloudflare so I ended up using github. It was also better ui wise but now its just a mess

    Edit: slowly i'm starting to move everything to codeberg

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I'm OOTL. Why is Codeberg better than GitLab?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    I'm honestly blown away by whomever finds this surprising. This is Microsoft we're talking about. Everything they touch turns into this. Taking what is not theirs, using it for profit, and not even giving credit where credit is due.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Hold up, are you sure you can’t view Discussions or Wiki? Which sites can you not view them?

    I’m fine viewing them for public repos that I usually visit.

    Asking to make sure that Github is not slowly rolling out this lockdown.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    What are good alternatives to GitHub except selfhosting? I only know gitlab.com. Anything else?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I just checked, and unless I'm missing something, you're wrong? Tried https://github.com/snowplow/snowplow/wiki in private browser mode. Seems to work fine.. Discussions work too.

    And the restricted code search is not a big deal. You can still see and download all the source code you want and search that way. What usecase do you have for code searching without login? Lemmy is restricted too without login (as well as literally everything). The funny thing is that the last person I saw make a huge deal of this on Lemmy/Reddit, didn't have a huge number of github commits over the years (they definitely had some, so they were active though, but even our newbies at work overtook them in months)

    Creating a login is free too, and so is downloading source code. Github is a FREE service lol.. And you're whinging you need to create a free login? If you don't like Github, then don't use it lol. Absolutely nothing is preventing anyone migrating lol

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    I'm still stuck on why I have to create a password-equivalent API token, and then store it on my hard drive if I want an at-all-convenient workflow.

    "We made it more secure!"

    "How is storing it on my hard drive more secure"

    "Just have it expire after a week!"

    "How is it more secure now, seems like now there are two points of failure in the system, and anyway I keep hearing about security problems in github which this hasn't been a solution to any of them"

    "SHUT UP THAT'S HOW"

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    An API token is more secure than a password by virtue of it not needing to be typed in by a human. Phishing, writing down passwords, and the fact that API tokens can have restricted scopes all make them more secure.

    Expiration on its own doesn't make it more secure, but it can if it's in the context of loading the token onto a system that you might lose track of/not have access to in the future.

    Individual API tokens can also be revoked without revoking all of them, unlike a password where changing it means you have to re-login everywhere.

    And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Lmk if you have questions, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    They also broke some stuff with some javascript, I think. I'm using KDE's web browser (Falkon) and it used to work well.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Compared to Gitlab, it definitely is shit already. And that has nothing to do with the artificial restrictions. God I hate this website. I appreciate their service, but the UI is genuinely trash.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    You don't need the question mark. If something is for-profit (or can be used for profit) then sooner or later it will be enshittified.

    They have teams of people whose entire job is figuring out ways to wring a few more cents from somebody. Put them at the helm of a company that's stood for 1000 years and they'll be thrilled at how easy it will be to use that name to sell plastic dogshit at a premium price.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What about the time they fired their artists and then immediately wrote a blog post congratulating themselves for making AI art from a model trained on the ex-employees' art. Inspiring.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›