270
Enshittification of GitHub? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

First, they restricted code search without logging in so I'm using sourcegraph But now, I cant even view discussions or wiki without logging in.

It was a nice run

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'm OOTL. Why is Codeberg better than GitLab?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
    1. It is FOSS while GitLab EE is not.
    2. It supports a lot of atifact repository formats while GitLab only docker registry.
    3. It is a non-commercial project.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    1. It supports a lot of atifact repository formats while GitLab only docker registry.

    not true https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/package_registry/supported_package_managers.html

    that said, I hate gitlab and their commercial choices, they must die

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Thank you I missed when they added this. I only track a very old FR for rpm support and was sure that situation is similar with other repos. However gitea/forgejo supports more formats including rpm.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I'm not really sure it is. I just wish I'd shopped around before jumping to Gitlab, really.

    It kindof feels like Gitlab's aims are more commercial and Codeberg's are more in line with the FOSS movement, but that's just a vague sense I have based on things I've seen but no longer remember specifically.

    CalcProgrammer1's response to my post seems pretty informative and apropos, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent