top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 148 points 3 years ago* (21 children)

Time to De-Google I guess. I will keep using Firefox and if or when I come across any website pulling this crap I won't hesitate to blast them to eternity. I suggest everyone else do the same please.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Time was a decade ago... But better now than never.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    With that kind of attitude, it's a wonder no one listened to you a decade ago!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Lol. As soon as I heard someone upload their contacts to Google I thought "welp, I'm out." And yeah, no one listened then either.

    Still, we got diaspora working finally. May the force be with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I've been converting folks where I can! I work in IT for a huge corporation, so our computers all come pre-loaded with Firefox set as the default browser haha.

    And with you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Damn. How'd you swing that? Everyone I know is still stuck in the Microsoft/Chrome cycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    I don't give my users a choice at work and those computers are all locked down to where they'd need an admin to install Chrome.

    As far as my personal life goes, I've just been the go-to guy for computer questions for friends and family most of my life, so they usually listen to my advice, but it also helps to just go into detail as to why the change is necessary (not recommended, but necessary). No one likes to hear that their web browser is making it impossible to block ads and is streamlining the ad experience so they get more ads. Everyone despises ads lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    I’m just going to stop using sites that implement this tech. Maybe I’ll even make a site and actually contribute to the web with all the free time I’ll have 😇

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    It'll be next to impossible when those websites are your bank and Netflix etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 77 points 3 years ago (25 children)
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (21 children)

    How do you "de-google" when most websites expect most browsers to use chromium and start requiring this to ensure companies buying ad space get the best bang for their buck security?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Most websites? Haven't come across one yet (I am using Firefox on all devices and don't have any other browser installed) ... Do you have any examples?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yeah I don't think this comment is accurate, the only website that gives you a subpar experience to incentivize you to use a Chromium-based browser that I've come across is, well, google.com on mobile.

    Luckily you can download a plugin on Firefox to trick google.com to show you the Chromium experience, or you can just use something like startpage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 72 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    It's small, but here's a real actionable item that you can do to help:

    Put a gentle "Use Firefox" (or any other non-Chromium-based browser) message on your website. It doesn't have to be in-your-face, just something small. I've taken my own advice and added it to my own website: https://geeklaunch.io/ (Only appears in Chromium-based browsers.)

    We can slowly turn the tide, little by little.

    Copy and paste:

    <p>
        This site is designed for <a href="https://firefox.com/">Firefox</a>,
        a web browser that respects your privacy.
    </p>
    

    (I also posted this on the HN discussion.)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    One way to hide it for Firefox users.

    <p class="not-firefox-warning">
        This site is designed for <a href="https://firefox.com/">Firefox</a>,
        a web browser that respects your privacy.
    </p>
    <style>
    @-moz-document url-prefix() {  .not-firefox-warning { display: none; }}
    </style>
    
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    IE in the 2000's called, it wants it's dream back.

    Between this, hobbling adblockers and performing enough monopolistic acts to warrant swift government action, I really see this more as Chrome dying than the web itself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Honestly this won't effect me a ton, though I wouldn't be surprised if I have to boot up a windows virtual machine just to check my bank in a few years cause my bank doesn't know what Linux is and doesn't want go trust it. I'm mad about it but given slowly but surely I've been replacing everything with FOSS stuff. I just fear one day they will force you to use corpo approved software to use WiFi , or get cell service

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It will likely not work inside a VM. Haven't looked into the implementation, but they will probably want to use the hardware DRM manufacturers have been sneaking into the CPUs and GPUs.

    So you will be required to use "approved" CPU, "approved" OS and "approved" browser to access certain websites, as it is already the case with online streaming. You can kiss foss goodbye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago (29 children)
  • [–] 56 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    You will use the web as google said or you won't use it at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    How to kill 3% of your userbase: implement DRM

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Google is pushing some bullshit that would allow websites to check if a client (you, your browser, your device) is on the okie-dokey list. If yes, you may enter e. g. Youtube, if not the you're out. It's like a bouncer for websites and of course Google would be that bouncer. So you might stand out in the rain if you are using one of the following:

    • VPN

    • Adblock

    • Non-Chromium browser like Firefox

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    WEI checks your browser, your extensions and your OS to ensure that a site is not tampered with. Officially it's to make sure that sites don't have to deal as much with bots.

    Too bad that many of us use adblockers to protect us from malicious ads or remove ads to make a website bearable. Google also happens to distribute ads which makes the fact that adblockers likely won't work anymore a very concenient coincidence they totally didn't have in mind.

    It's also possible that non-Chromium browsers (for example Firefox) will stop working due to them either not supporting WEI or not being considered legitimate by whoever will do the checks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    So this is a problem for all browsers based on Chromium right???

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Question for anyone with more understanding of the implementation…

    Doesn’t this still presume the browser tells the truth to the third party attester? Could we not build something that just straight up lies to the attester? Says I’m a good Google chrome user with no extensions please serve me ads sir?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    My understanding was that the browser vendor itself would be the attester. So if Google says it's Google Chrome, it probably is. Unless you somehow reverse engineer how Google decides that it's Google Chrome and spoof that or something...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Can you explain to someone not so tech savy what this means?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Is there anything a person can do about it, other than using Firefox and degoogling?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›