top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Why is Ubuntu getting so much hate? it was a good entrance for many people into the Linux world

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It started when they started including Amazon sponsored results in the menu search really. These days using apt occasionally will install a snap package instead of a deb. It doesn't give people a good jumping on point and it teaches that linux is more difficult than it has to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Isn't Linux mint an Ubuntu fork? That gets recommended to tons of people who seek an entrance into the Linux world. Is it as bad as Ubuntu?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    It is a fork, meaning its like ubuntu but with the bullshit that makes ubuntu bad removed. It is completly safe but if you wanna stay clear of any trace of ubuntu at all there is also a debian based version of mint

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Debian Mint is the way to go now for entry in Linux if you ask me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    LMDE and PopOS are my consistent recommendations to newcomers. If one doesn’t work, the other will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] [S] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It USED to be OK. Now, it's just bloat, ads for snaps and pro features.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Can someone please show me these ads for snaps? I've been using Ubuntu for almost 4 years and I've never seen an ad for anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They don't really asvertise snaps in the OS per say, but they do push users to use snaps instead of .deb packages. Why? My best guess is they wanna monopozie the portable app market (Snaps, Flatpak, AppImage) and become sort of like what systemd is now - unreasonable to ask to use anything else but systemd.

    Pro features ads are right there when you do apt update or apt upgrade (can't remember which one of these, maybe both).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Is it an ad or is it just letting you know about a feature you can use? I don't personally consider that an ad.

    Unpopular opinion I prefer snaps over flatpak. At least when I update snaps I actually know how much is going to be downloaded lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    They forced Firefox's default package into a snap recently. They did this without integrating with Gnome or common plugins like password managers. This of course broke a ton of shit out of the blue.

    Then, to get Firefox off of snap, you have to do a non zero amount of config instead of giving the users a simple option at install. If you mess that config up at all, the next Firefox update just goes back to snap.

    Forcing people's primary application into an Canonical controlled packaging system is likely worse than an ad, honestly. It made it very clear to me that Ubuntu did not respect user choice like it used to, so i migrated off of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago*

    Well, yeah. It's not actually an add, but it does say that there are pro features available (can't remember exactly what it said). It's just pushy, not something I'd expect to see in a Linux distro.

    I don't like either, I always use native pacakges. I repackage what is not available for the distro I currently use. It's just simpler IMO. One pacakge manager, all apps are available system wide, so if I decide to switch accounts or someone else might wanna use my computer/laptop, no prob, just log in as Guest, do whatever, log out.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

    Is this also true for headless servers? I’ve been using Ubuntu via SSH for 15 years now and it’s always been fine for me but I’ve also never run the desktop version (for more than a few days anyway.)

    I just installed it on a scavenged workstation last month to use as a media server and I didn’t notice anything unusual.

    Edit:

    While we’re at it, what does the hive mind think I should be using instead for turning old trash PCs into shitty servers? The only thing Lemmy has taught me so far is that Ubuntu sucks and the only truly honorable choice is to quit my job and stop speaking to my family so that I can devote my life to installing drivers on unstable Arch. Also, I’m supposed to buy some thigh-high stockings and learn to tuck apparently?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Firefox snap doesn't work with keepassxc browser integration and smart cards randomly, so I uninstalled the default snap on ubuntu, edited configs to make sure it didnt grab snap by default, and then install the deb Firefox.

    Every single fucking time I did a distro upgrade, ubuntu uninstalled deb Firefox, rwdis the configs to automatically install snap Firefox, and then reinstalled snap Firefox.

    One of the reasons I left windows was because it kept changing my default browser. How is ubuntu any better?

    I started my linux journey on ubuntu 11.10. I have some real nostalgia and loyalty to that platform, but I recently gave up on it and switched to fedora because of its relentless self-promotion is snap. I feel like you'd be doing a disservice to recommend it as a gateway into Linux to someone nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Yeah, like 20 years ago. Things change. Hoary Hedgehog was my first real daily driver, and I miss what Ubuntu was. But that Ubuntu is no more.

    These days I use Debian for that old school no-BS Ubuntu feel. If I'm gonna use a .deb based distro, might as well use the granddaddy of them all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Part of it is the fact that Ubuntu is an entry level sort of OS, it's been simplified down and made easy. So the sort of people who have it are often less tech-savvy, and when something does go wrong, they ask a lot of pretty basic seeming questions.

    This isn't helped by some of Canonical's design choices. Nothing overt, but Ubuntu has a flavor that's distinctly Ubuntu, and knowledge of other distros is sometimes a detriment in solving problems.

    Canonical is also a company that just rubs some people the wrong way. There was some data collection shit where they asked users to opt-out of collection, after installing the data collection app.

    Then there's Snaps... it's their own unique take on program management. Which is a Canonical thing, reinventing the wheel so that they can have their own unique little thing. Like Mir and Unity, which were then both abandoned to the community.

    It's good that the community can take over when Canonical drops something, but still...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Linux users are famous for e-peen measuring and tearing each other down.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "The Pianist" (2002), btw. In case anyone didn't know and was wondering.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I have old history with Linux and am just coming back. I did my first test build for my office to get away from the dying Windows 10/avoiding 11. I went with a basic Linux Mint cinnamon build, got our network printer and core software working. Will you let me live?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Yes, but you better be installing arch on your toaster by next week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I went to install Arch and it did not seem easy. I opted for Cinnamon Mint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Try Void it has an installer πŸ˜‰.

    Kidding, stick to Mint until you feel ready you can take a bigger bite. And do opt for the Debian Edition Mint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ubuntu is fine as a gateway drug imo. It hasn't made the best decisions over time though, but I appreciate it's contribution regardless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Me: "I use Arch btw!"

    Still gets shot

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ubuntu server is fine relax

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Why they shoot him? With ak's No, no

    He need one of these

    1000006663

    We need to make sure to get rid of them snaps

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί