It promises to be the one-in-all chatting app, based on matrix, providing compatibility to other apps (Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp etc.) through bridges.

So what do you think, from a privacy point of view and also user friendliness on the other hand?

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 3 years ago (1 child)

I don’t think very highly of a cloud based app asking me for my credentials for every other cloud based app I used.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    if Lorem Ipsum is the first information i have about an app, i don't need to think about it. This is from their webpage 👉

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    “For example, if you send a message from Beeper to a friend on WhatsApp, the message is encrypted on your Beeper client, sent to the Beeper web service, which decrypts and re-encrypts the message with WhatsApp's proprietary encryption protocol.”

    So, not really end to end for most common use-cases.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    I was thinking it was something like what pidgin does on desktop, adapted for mobile, and was highly enthusiastic, but realized it works using matrix bridges and doesn't process locally...

    Well, at least it can be self hosted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Given this is !privacy and the advertise as front page features both “works will all your messaging apps” and “end to end encryption”, it seems important to flag currently those aren’t mutually compatible.

    It’s not their fault the apps don’t have e2e APIs, it’s a tough problem, but the secrecy and privacy guarantee is just “trust us to stick to our policy”. And they’re a start-up, tooling isn’t perfect (or even exist), mistakes happen, etc

    Their self-hosting looks interesting, but then it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    In order to provide the service, Beeper collects device information, including OS, hardware, public IP addresses, network routing information, information on the installed Beeper client, and other device settings.

    🤔

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago
    [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Also the service is 18+. Most likely to avoid stricter data protection around children data.

    Source: https://www.beeper.com/terms

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    This seems too good to be true, but deserves to be tested. Apparently, you have the option to self host your web service, in case you don't want to give them your data.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    I like it so far, seems to work reliably and the client is leaps better than any other Matrix client on iOS.
    Haven’t checked out the option to self host the bridges yet but it’s on my list.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Isn't this just adding another potential point of failure to every single service you add to it? Hard pass.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    I've been on the waitlist for a while and am excited to get through. It may suck but it's worth testing. The privacy issues aren't ideal but it doesn't seem like they sell your data.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›