Edit 1 :

@AteshgaRubyTeeth@lemmy.world.

If you’re fed up with companies fucking you over there’s an alternative.

There software called Nextcloud which you can run on a server which works in comparable ways as Onedrive/Google Drive/Dropbox/etc. works.

You could host it yourself on a server if you know how.

If you’re not familiar with forwarding ports or setting static IP adresses you can rent some server space from Hetzner where Nextcloud is included.

Edit 2 :

@TheFederatedPipe@kbin.social

I’m totally in favor with your post, but not everyone is willing to self-host or is capable of doing it. So I recommendation would be and one that I’m currently using, is when uploading a file to these cloud services encrypt your files. I’m using #cryptomator, but I’m sure there are other alternatives, like #rclone. There is also #veracrypt, but to my understanding, is not great for cloud sync.

Cryptomator official website Quick youtube video in how to use cryptomator (3:51)

Cryptomator is open source and free, but only on desktop. To use the mobile version, you will have to pay. Here is a list of alternatives to cryptomator, if you are familiar with one, please share your knowledge.

Edit 3 :

@danileonis@lemmy.ml

Don’t forget Syncthing, I always suggest it first since it doesn’t require a server or advanced knowledge to work.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 2 years ago* (21 children)

If you’re fed up with companies fucking you over there’s an alternative.

There software called Nextcloud which you can run on a server which works in comparable ways as Onedrive/Google Drive/Dropbox/etc. works.

You could host it yourself on a server if you know how.

If you’re not familiar with forwarding ports or setting static IP adresses you can rent some server space from Hetzner where Nextcloud is included.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    i've recently figured out how dynamic DNSs work, i am unstoppable.

    now i just need to figure out how to encrypt traffic...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    LetsEncrypt offers free SSL certificates, if you're familiar with reverse proxies then it's not too difficult to implement. I have mine set up to automatically renew my wildcard cert, then send a special signal to the nginx docker container for it to reload the SSL certs

    A more onedrive/google drive-like alternative to Nextcloud would be Syncthing, which is E2EE and doesn't need additional config of SSL certs and the like

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I got some angry letters from my ISP when I was younger for using dynamic DNS, ranging from it being a virus to it violating their terms.

    No idea of they still get pissy about it or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Any chance you could explain the basics of how the Hetzner thing would work? I'm noob

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Missing option that I use:

    Free Google Drive mounted with rclone and then eCryptfs filesystem mounted on the Google Drive mountpoint.

    I get the free space and Google only sees encrypted files.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago*

    not bad too, i will not edit the body with that because i think it can be against the ToS of Google, and if not and that's become a popular solution, that will be for sure in it then.

    You can loose your account so easily with them, so its better to be "reliable" ^^

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yet another reminder that the cloud is just a fancy name for someone else's computer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    DropBox has been dead to me since 2014 when they put former US Sec. of State Condoleezza Rice on their board of directors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Don't forget Syncthing, I always suggest it first since it doesn't require a server or advanced knowledge to work.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    We need to move away from proprietary "cloud" solutions.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I do not see that option under the Dropbox settings.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The only real way to opt out of this shit is to start using a better cloud and nuke Dropbox from every computer you own

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    If it's not open source and self hosted, I think it will probably turn out just the same as Dropbox. It's the power dynamic. Closed SaaS, on someone else's computers, is a very weak position. Not surprising when the relationship turns abusive.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm totally in favor with your post, but not everyone is willing to self-host or is capable of doing it. So I recommendation would be and one that I'm currently using, is when uploading a file to these cloud services encrypt your files. I'm using #cryptomator, but I'm sure there are other alternatives, like #rclone. There is also #veracrypt, but to my understanding, is not great for cloud sync.

    Cryptomator official website
    Quick youtube video in how to use cryptomator (3:51)

    Cryptomator is open source and free, but only on desktop. To use the mobile version, you will have to pay. Here is a list of alternatives to cryptomator, if you are familiar with one, please share your knowledge.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    If you have to use cloud storage, encrypt the files before you upload them

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There's always Cryptomator too. VeraCrypt also works and syncs quickly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Time to fill dropbox with gos of eroticas.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Awesome photo choice!

    "What's in the box?"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    "Third-party AI services are only used when customers actively engage with Dropbox AI features which themselves are clearly labeled,"

    Should be fine since I never ever use DB then.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I never opted in, no DropBox, OneDrive nor GDrive.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Self hosting isn't a solution to replace off site storage.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How is this legal? Isn't this a violation of copyright law at the very least, plus any other licenses that might apply to the files?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 years ago

    i think its a scenario well accepted within the terms of uses...

    Recently those of OpenAi changed btw, and that's very interesting.. to read.
    They sent the mail the night of Christmas if i'm not wrong lmaooooo

    If laws were made for citizens, we would know for now 😆

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The problem with cryptomater in my mind is eventually with quantum computing the encryption will be cracked. Even if you delete the file its stored somwhere else in their backups. There will be a treasure of good information even if its 10 yearas from now to be harvested.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I would recommend proton drive as a great replacement if you want something that doesn't need a server

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›